Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28936751›Full record

Observational studyPituitary2018

Guidelines versus real life practice: the case of colonoscopy in acromegaly.

M Parolin, F Dassie, L Russo, S Mazzocut, M Ferrata, E De Carlo, R Mioni, F Fallo, R Vettor, C Martini and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pituitary, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Growth hormone and gastrointestinal malignancy: An intriguing link.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2023
    Review
  4. Clinical Characteristics and Associated Factors of Colonic Polyps in Acromegaly.Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Acromegaly and Colorectal Neoplasm: An Update.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M ParolinDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy. matteoparolin@hotmail.it.
F DassieDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
L RussoDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
S MazzocutDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
M FerrataDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
E De CarloDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
R MioniDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
F FalloDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
R VettorDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
C MartiniDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
P MaffeiDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), Padua University Hospital, via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to investigate guideline application and colonoscopy findings in real-life practice in acromegaly.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational non-interventional and cross-sectional analysis on 146 patients with acromegaly (ACRO) referred to our clinic. We evaluated colonoscopy data, focusing on the correlation between colonoscopy findings and hormonal/metabolic values.

resultsThe total number of colonoscopies performed in ACRO patients increased from 6 in the period 1990-1994 to 57 in the period 2010-2014. Colonoscopy procedures were performed according to guidelines in 25% of ACRO patients at diagnosis, 51% at follow-up and 11% globally (both at diagnosis and follow-up). Among the 146 ACRO patients, 68% were subjected to at least one colonoscopy and in 32% of the cases a polyp was detected during the procedure. The presence of polyps was significantly associated with mean levels of growth hormone (GH), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), fasting glucose and insulin levels (p < 0.05). Polyps were detected in 48% of untreated patients and in 26% of patients under treatment for acromegaly (p = 0.04). The general risk of polyps and adenomatous polyps in ACRO patients was higher compared to the control population of Veneto Region, Italy (odds ratio 1.33 and 1.16, respectively). No cancerous polyps were detected in our analysis.

conclusionIn real-life practice, adherence to ACRO colonoscopy clinical guidelines was lower than expected. Among patients who underwent colonoscopy, the prevalence of colon polyps was higher for ACRO patients, suggesting the need for new strategies to ensure adherence to colonoscopy guidelines.

Indexed as

AcromegalyAdenomatous PolypsAdultAgedChi-Square DistributionColonColonic NeoplasmsColonic PolypsColonoscopyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedAcromegalyColonoscopyPolyposisReal life practice

Identifiers

PMID28936751
OpenAlexW2759571078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.