ArticleOdontology2018
Significant prognostic factors affecting treatment outcomes of salivary gland carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective analysis.
Article in Odontology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Salivary gland pathologies: evolution in classification and association with unique genetic alterations.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023Review
- Clinico-Epidemiological Analysis of Most Prevalent Parotid Gland Carcinomas in Poland over a 20-Year Period.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Outcome and management of rare high-grade "salivary" adenocarcinoma: the important role of adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2019Article
- External beam radiotherapy for the treatment of feline salivary gland carcinoma: six new cases and a review of the literature.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic factor in salivary gland carcinoma patients. Clinical and pathological data of 211 consecutive patients who treated with curative intent were analyzed. The overall survival (OS) rate, local control rate, and distant metastasis rate were calculated. To examine a prognostic factor in salivary gland carcinoma patients, a multivariate analysis was performed. The 5-year-OS rate was 84.0%, and 10-year was 69.2%. The 5-year-local control rate was 84.6%, and 10-year was 70.1%. The 5-year-distant metastasis rate was 16.9%, and 10-year was 21.1%. In a multivariate analysis, the OS rate was affected by pN(+), high-grade malignancy, and primary tumor size. The local control was affected by the primary tumor size, high-grade malignancy, and the status of the surgical margin. The primary tumor size and pN(+) were associated with the distant metastasis. The results of this study suggested that pN(+), malignancy grade, primary tumor size, and the margin status might affect the prognosis of salivary gland carcinoma patients. Postoperative radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy were suggested the possibility of contribution to the good prognosis of salivary gland carcinoma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28936637What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.