SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2018
Defining and Measuring Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicine: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
114 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The predictive value of multidimensional frailty instruments for postoperative adverse outcomes in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Factors associated with receiving a Functional Disorder diagnostic label: A systematic review.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Correlates of illness uncertainty in cancer survivors and family caregivers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Communication of Diagnostic Uncertainty in Primary Care and Its Impact on Patient Experience: an Integrative Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic uncertainty in primary care: what is known about its communication, and what are the associated ethical issues?Family practice · 2021Pooled it
- The informal curriculum of family medicine - what does it entail and how is it taught to residents? A systematic review.BMC family practice · 2020Pooled it
- Real time self-rating of decision certainty by clinicians: a systematic review.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2019Pooled it
- Managing and Communicating Diagnostic Uncertainty in Pediatric Emergency Care: National Insights and Opportunities for Intervention.Pediatric emergency care · 2026Article
- A multi-institutional rapid qualitative assessment of factors supporting diagnostic excellence in hospital medicine.Journal of hospital medicine · 2026Article
- Exploration of Physiotherapists' Understanding and Application of Safety Netting Procedures in France-A Qualitative Study.Musculoskeletal care · 2026Article
- Article
- Observable Classification Patterns and Diagnostic Uncertainty in Parotid Ultrasound: A Multimethod Secondary Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Exercises in Clinical Reasoning: Applying High-Value Care When the Counts Don't Add Up.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- What aspects of clinical uncertainty are addressed by published competencies in evidence-based medicine? A scoping review.BMJ open · 2026Article
- When emergency physicians meet patients displaying irritable behaviours: a randomised vignette-based experiment investigating physicians' emotions and clinical reasoning.BMJ quality & safety · 2026Article
- Colorectal cancer surgery without preoperative histology does not compromise surgical quality-A nationwide cohort study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Article
- Physician-Reported Diagnostic Uncertainty Among Children Discharged From the Pediatric Emergency Department With Acute Respiratory Illness.Pediatric emergency care · 2026Article
- Screening for Missed Opportunities for Diagnosis in the ED Using eTriggers and Large Language Models.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Clinical Plausibility in Large Language Model Robustness Testing for Medicine: A Scoping Review.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Responsive Equanimity to Uncertainty: Towards the Construction of a Concept for Handling Medical Uncertainty in Clinical Practice.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026Article
54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPhysicians routinely encounter diagnostic uncertainty in practice. Despite its impact on health care utilization, costs and error, measurement of diagnostic uncertainty is poorly understood. We conducted a systematic review to describe how diagnostic uncertainty is defined and measured in medical practice.
methodsWe searched OVID Medline and PsycINFO databases from inception until May 2017 using a combination of keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Additional search strategies included manual review of references identified in the primary search, use of a topic-specific database (AHRQ-PSNet) and expert input. We specifically focused on articles that (1) defined diagnostic uncertainty; (2) conceptualized diagnostic uncertainty in terms of its sources, complexity of its attributes or strategies for managing it; or (3) attempted to measure diagnostic uncertainty. KEY
resultsWe identified 123 articles for full review, none of which defined diagnostic uncertainty. Three attributes of diagnostic uncertainty were relevant for measurement: (1) it is a subjective perception experienced by the clinician; (2) it has the potential to impact diagnostic evaluation-for example, when inappropriately managed, it can lead to diagnostic delays; and (3) it is dynamic in nature, changing with time. Current methods for measuring diagnostic uncertainty in medical practice include: (1) asking clinicians about their perception of uncertainty (surveys and qualitative interviews), (2) evaluating the patient-clinician encounter (such as by reviews of medical records, transcripts of patient-clinician communication and observation), and (3) experimental techniques (patient vignette studies).
conclusionsThe term "diagnostic uncertainty" lacks a clear definition, and there is no comprehensive framework for its measurement in medical practice. Based on review findings, we propose that diagnostic uncertainty be defined as a "subjective perception of an inability to provide an accurate explanation of the patient's health problem." Methodological advancements in measuring diagnostic uncertainty can improve our understanding of diagnostic decision-making and inform interventions to reduce diagnostic errors and overuse of health care resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.