ArticleInnovative surgical sciences2017
Surgical data science: The new knowledge domain.
Article in Innovative surgical sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Sequence of Steps: A Key Concept Missing in Surgical Training-A Systematic Review and Recommendations to Include It.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review of the use of big data to improve surgery in low- and middle-income countries.The British journal of surgery · 2019Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-based phase recognition for workflow analysis in robotic choledochal cyst excision: a proof-of-concept study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Adult Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery: Real-World Deployments and Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for perioperative precision in surgical oncology.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Groin hernia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
- Big data for neuroscience in the context of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.The EPMA journal · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in surgery.Nature medicine · 2024Review
- Virtual tumor mapping and margin control with 3-D planning and navigation.Innovative surgical sciences · 2024Review
- Enhancing surgical performance in cardiothoracic surgery with innovations from computer vision and artificial intelligence: a narrative review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Review
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy critical view of safety (LC-CVS): a multi-national validation study of an objective, procedure-specific assessment using video-based assessment (VBA).Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Using AI to Predict Patients' Length of Stay: PACU Staff's Needs and Expectations for Developing and Implementing an AI System.Journal of nursing management · 2024Article
- Intelligent surgical workflow recognition for endoscopic submucosal dissection with real-time animal study.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence Methods and Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Metrics for Surgical Education: A Multidisciplinary Consensus.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2022Article
- Translational research in health technologies: A scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Article
- A Machine Learning Approach for Postoperative Outcome Prediction: Surgical Data Science Application in a Thoracic Surgery Setting.World journal of surgery · 2021Article
- [Artificial intelligence in general and visceral surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020Review
- CAI4CAI: The Rise of Contextual Artificial Intelligence in Computer Assisted Interventions.Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers · 2020Article
- [Model-based treatment in surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Healthcare in general, and surgery/interventional care in particular, is evolving through rapid advances in technology and increasing complexity of care with the goal of maximizing quality and value of care. While innovations in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies have driven past improvements in quality of surgical care, future transformation in care will be enabled by data. Conventional methodologies, such as registry studies, are limited in their scope for discovery and research, extent and complexity of data, breadth of analytic techniques, and translation or integration of research findings into patient care. We foresee the emergence of Surgical/Interventional Data Science (SDS) as a key element to addressing these limitations and creating a sustainable path toward evidence-based improvement of interventional healthcare pathways. SDS will create tools to measure, model and quantify the pathways or processes within the context of patient health states or outcomes, and use information gained to inform healthcare decisions, guidelines, best practices, policy, and training, thereby improving the safety and quality of healthcare and its value. Data is pervasive throughout the surgical care pathway; thus, SDS can impact various aspects of care including prevention, diagnosis, intervention, or post-operative recovery. Existing literature already provides preliminary results suggesting how a data science approach to surgical decision-making could more accurately predict severe complications using complex data from pre-, intra-, and post-operative contexts, how it could support intra-operative decision-making using both existing knowledge and continuous data streams throughout the surgical care pathway, and how it could enable effective collaboration between human care providers and intelligent technologies. In addition, SDS is poised to play a central role in surgical education, for example, through objective assessments, automated virtual coaching, and robot-assisted active learning of surgical skill. However, the potential for transforming surgical care and training through SDS may only be realized through a cultural shift that not only institutionalizes technology to seamlessly capture data but also assimilates individuals with expertise in data science into clinical research teams. Furthermore, collaboration with industry partners from the inception of the discovery process promotes optimal design of data products as well as their efficient translation and commercialization. As surgery continues to evolve through advances in technology that enhance delivery of care, SDS represents a new knowledge domain to engineer surgical care of the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.