Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28936429›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational imaging2017

Clinical PET/MRI in neurooncology: opportunities and challenges from a single-institution perspective.

Lisbeth Marner, Otto M Henriksen, Michael Lundemann, Vibeke Andrée Larsen, Ian Law

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. International EANM-SNMMI-ISMRM consensus recommendation for PET/MRI in oncology.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Maximizing the use of batch production ofNeuro-oncology practice · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Advances in simultaneous PET/MR for imaging neuroreceptor function.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Hybrid PET/MRI imaging in healthy unsedated newborn infants with quantitative rCBF measurements usingJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The vast potential and bright future of neuroimaging.The British journal of radiology · 2018
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lisbeth MarnerDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Otto M HenriksenDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Michael LundemannDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Vibeke Andrée LarsenDepartment of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ian LawDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, 9 Blegdamsvej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a key role in neurooncology, i.e., for diagnosis, treatment evaluation and detection of recurrence. However, standard MRI cannot always separate malignant tissue from other pathologies or treatment-induced changes. Advanced MRI techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion imaging and spectroscopy show promising results in discriminating malignant from benign lesions. Further, supplemental imaging with amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) has been shown to increase accuracy significantly and is used routinely at an increasing number of sites. Several centers are now implementing hybrid PET/MRI systems allowing for multiparametric imaging, combining conventional MRI with advanced MRI and amino acid PET imaging. Neurooncology is an obvious focus area for PET/MR imaging.

methodsBased on the literature and our experience from more than 300 PET/MRI examinations of brain tumors with

resultsAlthough the results are increasingly promising, the added value and range of indications for multiparametric imaging with PET/MRI are yet to be established. Robust solutions to overcome the number of issues when using a PET/MRI scanner are being developed, which is promising for a more routine use in the future.

conclusionsIn a clinical setting, a PET/MRI scan may increase accuracy in discriminating recurrence from treatment changes, although sequential same-day imaging on separate systems will often constitute a reliable and cost-effective alternative. Pediatric patients who require general anesthesia will benefit the most from simultaneous PET and MR imaging.

Indexed as

18F-fluoro-ethyl-tyrosineBrain tumorFETGliomaMultiparametric imagingPediatricPET/MRI

Identifiers

PMID28936429
PMCPMC5581366
OpenAlexW2554156183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.