Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28936415›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of disability2017

Wheelchair service provision education in academia.

Karen H Fung, Paula W Rushton, Rachel Gartz, Mary Goldberg, Maria L Toro, Nicky Seymour, Jonathan Pearlman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of disability, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Understanding the Global Challenges to Accessing Appropriate Wheelchairs: Position Paper.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Editorial.African journal of disability · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karen H FungSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3814-0757
Paula W RushtonSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7406-0477
Rachel GartzRehabilitation Science & Technology, University of Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8547-2207
Mary GoldbergRehabilitation Science & Technology, University of Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4922-9186
Maria L ToroDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidad CES, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-4950-0191
Nicky SeymourMotivation Charitable Trust, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3427-3774
Jonathan PearlmanRehabilitation Science & Technology, University of Pittsburgh, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0830-9136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn estimated 70 million people with disabilities need wheelchairs. To address this global crisis, the World Health Organization (WHO) proposed an eight-step wheelchair service provision model to ensure service quality regardless of resource setting. The International Society of Wheelchair Professionals (ISWP) aims to facilitate the integration of the WHO eight-step model into professional rehabilitation programmes.

objectiveTo develop an enhanced understanding of the current wheelchair service provision education provided in professional rehabilitation programmes worldwide.

methodsIn a cross-sectional design, an online survey was distributed to ISWP contacts of educational institutions. Quantitative responses were analysed through summary statistics and qualitative answers were analysed by content analyses. When relevant, educational institutions were stratified into resource settings.

resultsSeventy-two representatives of educational institutions in 21 countries completed the survey. Wheelchair content was taught in 79% of represented institutions, of which 75% of respondents reported using original course material, 10% of respondents used WHO Wheelchair Service Training Packages and 15% of respondents used other available resources. The majority of educational institutions teaching with their own wheelchair-related course material taught ≤ 20 hours. Fourteen of the 15 respondents without wheelchair education, expressed an interest in integrating wheelchair education into their academic curricula.

conclusionThe majority of the educational institutions teach wheelchair education; however, there is great variability in what and how it is taught and evaluated. The results demonstrate the need for more in-depth investigation regarding the integration process of wheelchair education in educational institutions, with the ultimate goal of improving wheelchair service provision worldwide.

Identifiers

PMID28936415
PMCPMC5594266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.