ArticleCureus2017
Shared Decision Making in Immigrant Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Lip Service: A Position Paper to Truly Stimulate Shared Decision-Making.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Shared Decision-Making in Children's Healthcare by Parents' Immigrant Status: Findings from the 2021-2022 U.S. National Survey of Children's Health.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Article
- Dialysis decision-making process by Chinese American patients at an urban, academic medical center: a retrospective chart review.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- "What it really takes" - A qualitative study of how professionals coproduce healthcare service with immigrant patients.Journal of migration and health · 2022Article
- Patients' perspective on shared decision-making in urology: a prospective study at a university hospital.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Satisfaction with obstetric care in a population of low-educated native Dutch and non-western minority women. Focus group research.PloS one · 2019Article
- Post-migration follow-up programme for migrants at increased risk of developing tuberculosis: a cohort study.ERJ open research · 2018Article
- Physicians' perspectives on communication and decision making in clinical encounters for treatment of latent tuberculosis infection.ERJ open research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Communication is at the core of shared decision making, and communication difficulties are therefore barriers to using shared decision making in clinical practice. In clinical encounters with immigrant patients from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, a number of communication challenges arise, which can be obstacles to the implementation of shared decision making. Here, we discuss some of these challenges, possible solutions and research required to address identified knowledge gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.