Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28936111›Full record

ArticleJournal of health informatics in developing countries2017

Agile Development of a Smartphone App for Perinatal Monitoring in a Resource-Constrained Setting.

Boris Martinez, Rachel Hall-Clifford, Enma Coyote, Lisa Stroux, Camilo E Valderrama, Christopher Aaron, Aaron Francis, Cate Hendren, Peter Rohloff, Gari D Clifford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health informatics in developing countries, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Boris MartinezWuqu' Kawoq Maya Health Alliance, Santiago Sacatepéquez, Guatemala.
Rachel Hall-CliffordDepartments of Sociology and Anthropology and Public Health, Agnes Scott College, Atlanta, GA.
Enma CoyoteWuqu' Kawoq Maya Health Alliance, Santiago Sacatepéquez, Guatemala.
Lisa StrouxInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Camilo E ValderramaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Christopher AaronDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Aaron FrancisDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Cate HendrenWuqu' Kawoq Maya Health Alliance, Santiago Sacatepéquez, Guatemala.
Peter RohloffWuqu' Kawoq Maya Health Alliance, Santiago Sacatepéquez, Guatemala.
Gari D CliffordDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

Mobile Health Intervention to Improve Perinatal Continuum of Care in GuatemalaR21HD084114 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CLIFFORD, GARI DAVID · 2015 to 2016
$374k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD084114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technology provides the potential to empower frontline healthcare workers with low levels of training and literacy, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. An obvious platform for achieving this aim is the smartphone, a low cost, almost ubiquitous device with good supply chain infrastructure and a general cultural acceptance for its use. In particular, the smartphone offers the opportunity to provide augmented or procedural information through active audiovisual aids to illiterate or untrained users, as described in this article. In this article, the process of refinement and iterative design of a smartphone application prototype to support perinatal surveillance in rural Guatemala for indigenous Maya lay midwives with low levels of literacy and technology exposure is described. Following on from a pilot to investigate the feasibility of this system, a two-year project to develop a robust in-field system was initiated, culminating in a randomized controlled trial of the system, which is ongoing. The development required an agile approach, with the development team working both remotely and in country to identify and solve key technical and cultural issues in close collaboration with the midwife end-users. This article describes this process and intermediate results. The application prototype was refined in two phases, with expanding numbers of end-users. Some of the key weaknesses identified in the system during the development cycles were user error when inserting and assembling cables and interacting with the 1-D ultrasound-recording interface, as well as unexpectedly poor bandwidth for data uploads in the central healthcare facility. Safety nets for these issues were developed and the resultant system was well accepted and highly utilized by the end-users. To evaluate the effectiveness of the system after full field deployment, data quality, and corruption over time, as well as general usage of the system and the volume of application support for end-users required by the in-country team was analyzed. Through iterative review of data quality and consistent use of user feedback, the volume and percentage of high quality recordings was increased monthly. Final analysis of the impact of the system on obstetrical referral volume and maternal and neonatal clinical outcomes is pending conclusion of the ongoing clinical trial.

Indexed as

Agile DevelopmentGuatemalaIndigenousIUGRLMICsLow LiteracymHealthPerinatal Monitoring

Identifiers

PMID28936111
PMCPMC5604479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.