Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28935896›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Network heterogeneity regulates steering in actin-based motility.

Rajaa Boujemaa-Paterski, Cristian Suarez, Tobias Klar, Jie Zhu, Christophe Guérin, Alex Mogilner, Manuel Théry, Laurent Blanchoin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Polymerization force-regulated actin filament-Arp2/3 complex interaction dominates self-adaptive cell migrations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Biochemical and mechanical regulation of actin dynamics.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Rajaa Boujemaa-PaterskiCytomorphoLab, Biosciences & Biotechnology Institute of Grenoble, Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire & Végétale, Université Grenoble-Alpes/CEA/CNRS/INRA, 38054, Grenoble, France.
Cristian SuarezCytomorphoLab, Biosciences & Biotechnology Institute of Grenoble, Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire & Végétale, Université Grenoble-Alpes/CEA/CNRS/INRA, 38054, Grenoble, France.
Tobias KlarCytomorphoLab, Biosciences & Biotechnology Institute of Grenoble, Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire & Végétale, Université Grenoble-Alpes/CEA/CNRS/INRA, 38054, Grenoble, France.
Jie ZhuCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, 10012, USA.
Christophe GuérinCytomorphoLab, Biosciences & Biotechnology Institute of Grenoble, Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire & Végétale, Université Grenoble-Alpes/CEA/CNRS/INRA, 38054, Grenoble, France.
Alex MogilnerCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, 10012, USA. mogilner@cims.nyu.edu.
Manuel ThéryCytomorphoLab, Biosciences & Biotechnology Institute of Grenoble, Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire & Végétale, Université Grenoble-Alpes/CEA/CNRS/INRA, 38054, Grenoble, France. manuel.thery@cea.fr.
Laurent BlanchoinCytomorphoLab, Biosciences & Biotechnology Institute of Grenoble, Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire & Végétale, Université Grenoble-Alpes/CEA/CNRS/INRA, 38054, Grenoble, France. laurent.blanchoin@cea.fr.
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRNew York University · USCEA Grenoble · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLaboratoire de Physiologie CellulaireUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

Modeling mitotic spindle assemblyR01GM068952 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MOGILNER, ALEXANDER · 2003 to 2014
$4.4M
European Research CouncilNIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growth of branched actin networks powers cell-edge protrusions and motility. A heterogeneous density of actin, which yields to a tunable cellular response, characterizes these dynamic structures. We study how actin organization controls both the rate and the steering during lamellipodium growth. We use a high-resolution surface structuration assay combined with mathematical modeling to describe the growth of a reconstituted lamellipodium. We demonstrate that local monomer depletion at the site of assembly negatively impacts the network growth rate. At the same time, network architecture tunes the protrusion efficiency, and regulates the rate of growth. One consequence of this interdependence between monomer depletion and network architecture effects is the ability of heterogeneous network to impose steering during motility. Therefore, we have established that the general principle, by which the cell can modulate the rate and the direction of a protrusion, is by varying both density and architecture of its actin network.Protrusive cellular structures contain a heterogeneous density of actin, but whether this influences motility is not known. Using an in vitro system and modelling, here the authors show that local actin monomer depletion and network architecture can tune the rate of network growth to impose steering during motility.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonActinsAnimalsCell MovementMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, BiologicalMuscle, SkeletalPolymerizationPseudopodiaRabbitsActins

Identifiers

PMID28935896
PMCPMC5608943
OpenAlexW2754432529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.