Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28935631›Full record

ArticleMedical humanities2018

Cultural crossings of care: An appeal to the medical humanities.

Julia Kristeva, Marie Rose Moro, John Ødemark, Eivind Engebretsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical humanities, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Medical Humanities in the Nordics.The Journal of medical humanities · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Translating COVID-19: From Contagion to Containment.The Journal of medical humanities · 2022
    Article
  11. The Illness Experience of Long COVID Patients: A Qualitative Study Based on the Online Q&A Community Zhihu.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. On allegations of invasive species denialism.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julia KristevaCentre d'Études et de Recherches Interdisciplinaires en Lettres Arts Cinéma, Université Paris VII-Denis Diderot, Paris, France.
Marie Rose MoroMaison des Adolescents-Hopital Cochin, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
John ØdemarkDepartment of Cultural Studies and Oriental Languages, Faculty of Humanities, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Eivind EngebretsenInstitute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern medicine is confronted with cultural crossings in various forms. In facing these challenges, it is not enough to simply increase our insight into the cultural dimensions of health and well-being. We must, more radically, question the conventional distinction between the 'objectivity of science' and the 'subjectivity of culture'. This obligation creates an urgent call for the medical humanities but also for a fundamental rethinking of their grounding assumptions.Julia Kristeva (JK) has problematised the biomedical concept of health through her reading of the anthropogony of Cura (Care), who according to the Roman myth created man out of a piece of clay. JK uses this fable as an allegory for the cultural distinction between

Indexed as

CultureDelivery of Health CareHumanitiesConcept FormationHumanscarecultural encountersculturecuraevidencejulia kristevamedical humanitiespsychoanalysis

Identifiers

PMID28935631
PMCPMC5869466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.