Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28935626›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Wide Variability in Prethrombectomy Workflow Practices in the United States: A Multicenter Survey.

A P Kansagra, G C Meyers, M S Kruzich, D T Cross, C J Moran

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

A P KansagraFrom the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.P.K., D.T.C., C.J.M.) apkansagra@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9201-4551
G C MeyersBarnes-Jewish Hospital (G.C.M., M.S.K.), St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4988-7522
M S KruzichBarnes-Jewish Hospital (G.C.M., M.S.K.), St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0421-5685
D T CrossFrom the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.P.K., D.T.C., C.J.M.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8470-4897
C J MoranFrom the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (A.P.K., D.T.C., C.J.M.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5559-3390
Barnes-Jewish Hospital · USDeutsche Telekom (Austria) · ATWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeClinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion depend on the speed and quality of workflows leading to mechanical thrombectomy. In the absence of universally accepted best practices for workflow, developing stroke hospitals can benefit from improved awareness of real-world workflows in effect at experienced centers. To this end, we surveyed prethrombectomy workflow practices at stroke centers throughout the United States. MATERIALS AND

methodsE-mail and phone interviews were conducted with neurointerventional team members at 30 experienced, endovascular-capable stroke centers. Questions were chosen to reflect workflow components of triage, team activation, transport, case setup, and anesthesia.

resultsThere is wide variation in prethrombectomy workflows. At 53% of institutions, nonphysician staff respond to stroke alerts alongside physicians. Imaging triage involves noninvasive angiography or perfusion imaging at 97% and 63% of institutions, respectively. Neurointerventional consultation is initiated before the completion of neuroimaging at 86% of institutions, and the team is activated before a final treatment decision at 59%. The neurointerventional team most commonly arrives within 30 minutes. Patients may be transported to the neuroangiography suite before team arrival at 43% of institutions. Procedural trays are set up in advance of team arrival at 13% of centers; additional thrombectomy devices are centrally stored at 54%. A power injector for angiographic runs is consistently used at 43% of institutions. Anesthesiology routinely supports thrombectomies at 67% of institutions.

conclusionsPrethrombectomy workflows vary widely between experienced centers. Improved awareness of real-world workflows and their variations may help to guide institutions in designing their own protocols of care.

Indexed as

WorkflowAgedFemaleHumansMaleStrokeSurveys and QuestionnairesThrombectomyTriageUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28935626
PMCPMC7963759
OpenAlexW2759360699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.