Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28935617›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2017

The Adverse Drug Reactions from Patient Reports in Social Media Project: Five Major Challenges to Overcome to Operationalize Analysis and Efficiently Support Pharmacovigilance Process.

Cedric Bousquet, Badisse Dahamna, Sylvie Guillemin-Lanne, Stefan J Darmoni, Carole Faviez, Charles Huot, Sandrine Katsahian, Vincent Leroux, Suzanne Pereira, Christophe Richard and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Research Progress of Antitumor Pharmacovigilance].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. [Utilizing social media data in post-market safety surveillance].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Pruritus after discontinuation of cetirizine.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2019
    Article
  11. Using social media in safety signal management: is it reliable?Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2018
    Review
  12. Overview of this issue: pharmacovigilance, what is new?International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018
    Article
  13. Pharmacovigilance in oncology.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Cedric BousquetLaboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénieurie des Connaissances en e-Santé, U1142, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9775-2476
Badisse DahamnaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0762-2518
Sylvie Guillemin-LanneExpert System, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3528-2514
Stefan J DarmoniLaboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénieurie des Connaissances en e-Santé, U1142, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7162-318X
Carole FaviezKappa Santé, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1500-0236
Charles HuotExpert System, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9822-232X
Sandrine KatsahianUnité mixte de recherche 1138, équipe 22, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7261-0671
Vincent LerouxInstitut de Santé Urbaine, Saint Maurice, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3337-1129
Suzanne PereiraVidal, Issy Les Moulineaux, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5569-990X
Christophe RichardSanteos, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9817-7821
Stéphane SchückKappa Santé, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2642-7726
Julien SouvignetLaboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénieurie des Connaissances en e-Santé, U1142, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7278-4148
Agnès Lillo-Le LouëtAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Centre Régional de Pharmacovigilance, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8135-7340
Nathalie TexierKappa Santé, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3749-254X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdverse drug reactions (ADRs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Classical Pharmacovigilance process is limited by underreporting which justifies the current interest in new knowledge sources such as social media. The Adverse Drug Reactions from Patient Reports in Social Media (ADR-PRISM) project aims to extract ADRs reported by patients in these media. We identified 5 major challenges to overcome to operationalize the analysis of patient posts: (1) variable quality of information on social media, (2) guarantee of data privacy, (3) response to pharmacovigilance expert expectations, (4) identification of relevant information within Web pages, and (5) robust and evolutive architecture.

objectiveThis article aims to describe the current state of advancement of the ADR-PRISM project by focusing on the solutions we have chosen to address these 5 major challenges.

methodsIn this article, we propose methods and describe the advancement of this project on several aspects: (1) a quality driven approach for selecting relevant social media for the extraction of knowledge on potential ADRs, (2) an assessment of ethical issues and French regulation for the analysis of data on social media, (3) an analysis of pharmacovigilance expert requirements when reviewing patient posts on the Internet, (4) an extraction method based on natural language processing, pattern based matching, and selection of relevant medical concepts in reference terminologies, and (5) specifications of a component-based architecture for the monitoring system.

resultsConsidering the 5 major challenges, we (1) selected a set of 21 validated criteria for selecting social media to support the extraction of potential ADRs, (2) proposed solutions to guarantee data privacy of patients posting on Internet, (3) took into account pharmacovigilance expert requirements with use case diagrams and scenarios, (4) built domain-specific knowledge resources embeding a lexicon, morphological rules, context rules, semantic rules, syntactic rules, and post-analysis processing, and (5) proposed a component-based architecture that allows storage of big data and accessibility to third-party applications through Web services.

conclusionsWe demonstrated the feasibility of implementing a component-based architecture that allows collection of patient posts on the Internet, near real-time processing of those posts including annotation, and storage in big data structures. In the next steps, we will evaluate the posts identified by the system in social media to clarify the interest and relevance of such approach to improve conventional pharmacovigilance processes based on spontaneous reporting.

Indexed as

big datamedical terminologynatural language processingpharmacovigilancesocial media

Identifiers

PMID28935617
PMCPMC5629348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.