Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28935360›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

When Guidelines Conflict: A Case Study of Mammography Screening Initiation in the 1990s.

Mireille Jacobson, Srikanth Kadiyala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Health Inequity: Associations Between Cigarette Smoking Status and Mammogram Screening Among Women of Color.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A framework for personalized mammogram screening.Preventive medicine reports · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Screening and Selection: The Case of Mammograms.The American economic review · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mireille JacobsonUniversity of California Irvine, Paul Merage School of Business, and National Bureau of Economic Research, California.
Srikanth KadiyalaRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California. Electronic address: kadiyala@rand.org.

Funding

Are Disparities in Cancer Chemotherapy Treatment Affected by Medicare ReimbursemeR01CA152043 · NCI · RAND CORPORATION · PI JACOBSON, MIREILLE · 2010 to 2011
$603k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA152043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer screening guidelines communicate important information to patients and physicians regarding the costs and benefits of screening. Currently, guideline recommendations from major organizations conflict regarding the age of mammography screening initiation. To understand current and future U.S. mammography screening patterns we study age-mammography patterns from the 1990s, another period of conflicting guideline recommendations.

methodsWe examine mammography use rates by single year of age to understand compliance with guideline-recommended initiation ages in the 1990s. Mammography test use data was taken primarily from the 1991 to 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. The analytic sample included all women 35 to 54 years of age.

resultsWe found a discrete 8.7-percentage point increase in mammography use precisely at age 40 and a much smaller 1.6-percentage point increase in mammography use at age 50. These findings varied by insurance status, with the insured experiencing a large, discrete increase primarily at age 40 and the uninsured experiencing notable discrete increases at ages 40 and 50.

conclusionPhysicians and patients converged primarily on the age 40 mammography screening threshold during the 1990s. Prices, along with guidelines, were key determinants of the age of screening initiation, with the insured responding to age 40 coverage and cost-sharing reductions and the uninsured affected by guidelines and public funding tied to the age 50 threshold. The policy factors underlying these results, recent ACA coverage increases, and ACA cost-sharing requirements imply that a substantial number of women will continue to receive mammography screening in their 40s.

Indexed as

Health PolicyInsurance CoverageAdultAgedBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance SystemBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGuidelines as TopicHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID28935360
PMCPMC5694381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.