Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28935166›Full record

ReviewTrends in cell biology2017

Mitochondrial Nanotunnels.

Amy E Vincent, Doug M Turnbull, Veronica Eisner, György Hajnóczky, Martin Picard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cell biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Mitochondrial Maintenance in Skeletal Muscle.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Molecular mechanisms of mitochondrial dynamics.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy E VincentWellcome Trust Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Institute of Neurosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Doug M TurnbullWellcome Trust Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Institute of Neurosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Veronica EisnerDepartamento de Biología Celular y Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
György HajnóczkyMitoCare Center, Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Cell Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Martin PicardDivision of Behavioral Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neurology, The Merritt Center and Columbia Translational Neuroscience Initiative, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Columbia Aging Center, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY 10032, USA. Electronic address: martin.picard@columbia.edu.

Funding

Mechanisms of Pulsatile Calcium SignalingR01DK051526 · NIDDK · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI HAJNOCZKY, GYORGY · 2001 to 2016
$4.3M
Mitochondrial Stress Signal Transduction from Organelle to OrganismR35GM119793 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PICARD, MARTIN · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
MECHANISMS OF PULSATILE CALCIUM SIGNALINGR29DK051526 · NIDDK · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI HAJNOCZKY, GYORGY · 1996 to 2000
$121k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council G0700718Medical Research Council G0800674Medical Research Council MC_G0802536Medical Research Council MR/L016354/1NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK051526NIDDK NIH HHS R29 DK051526NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119793Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insight into the regulation of complex physiological systems emerges from understanding how biological units communicate with each other. Recent findings show that mitochondria communicate at a distance with each other via nanotunnels, thin double-membrane protrusions that connect the matrices of non-adjacent mitochondria. Emerging evidence suggest that mitochondrial nanotunnels are generated by immobilized mitochondria and transport proteins. This review integrates data from the evolutionarily conserved structure and function of intercellular projections in bacteria with recent developments in mitochondrial imaging that permit nanotunnel visualization in eukaryotes. Cell type-specificity, timescales, and the selective size-based diffusion of biomolecules along nanotunnels are also discussed. The joining of individual mitochondria into dynamic networks of communicating organelles via nanotunnels and other mechanisms has major implications for organelle and cellular behaviors.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological TransportCell Surface ExtensionsDNA, MitochondrialHumansMitochondriaMitochondrial MembranesMitochondrial ProteinsModels, BiologicalNanostructuresDNA, MitochondrialMitochondrial Proteinscommunicationmembrane dynamicsmitochondrionnanotunnelsignaling

Identifiers

PMID28935166
PMCPMC5749270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.