Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28935133›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2017

Functional Validation of Heteromeric Kainate Receptor Models.

Teresa Paramo, Patricia M G E Brown, Maria Musgaard, Derek Bowie, Philip C Biggin

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Competition between LiChemical science · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Teresa ParamoDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Patricia M G E BrownIntegrated Program in Neurosciences, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Maria MusgaardDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Derek BowieDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Philip C BigginDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: philip.biggin@bioch.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L01386X/1Medical Research Council MR/M000435/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kainate receptors require the presence of external ions for gating. Most work thus far has been performed on homomeric GluK2 but, in vivo, kainate receptors are likely heterotetramers. Agonists bind to the ligand-binding domain (LBD) which is arranged as a dimer of dimers as exemplified in homomeric structures, but no high-resolution structure currently exists of heteromeric kainate receptors. In a full-length heterotetramer, the LBDs could potentially be arranged either as a GluK2 homomer alongside a GluK5 homomer or as two GluK2/K5 heterodimers. We have constructed models of the LBD dimers based on the GluK2 LBD crystal structures and investigated their stability with molecular dynamics simulations. We have then used the models to make predictions about the functional behavior of the full-length GluK2/K5 receptor, which we confirmed via electrophysiological recordings. A key prediction and observation is that lithium ions bind to the dimer interface of GluK2/K5 heteromers and slow their desensitization.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein MultimerizationGlutamatesKainic Acid ReceptorsLigandsLithiumProtein DomainsProtein Structure, QuaternaryGlutamatesKainic Acid ReceptorsLigandsLithium

Identifiers

PMID28935133
PMCPMC5700254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.