Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28935011›Full record

ArticleZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2017

[Correlation between Serum Tumor Markers and Efficacy of First-line EGFR-TKIs in Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma].

Hanxiao Chen, Xue Yang, Huijun Liu, Kun Ma, Jia Zhong, Zhi Dong, Minglei Zhuo, Yuyan Wang, Jianjie Li, Tongtong An and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hanxiao ChenKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Thoracic Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Xue YangKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Thoracic Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Huijun LiuDepartment of Oncology, General Hospital of Xishan Coal and Electricity Workers, Taiyuan 030000, China.
Kun MaDepartment of Oncology, Chenggang Hospital, Chengde 067000, China.
Jia ZhongKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Thoracic Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Zhi DongKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Thoracic Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Minglei ZhuoKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Thoracic Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Yuyan WangKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Thoracic Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Jianjie LiKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Thoracic Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Tongtong AnKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Thoracic Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Meina WuKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Thoracic Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Ziping WangKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Thoracic Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Jun ZhaoKey laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Thoracic Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) significantly improve the survival of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring EGFR mutation. Limited to the standards of tumor tissue samples and detection methods, still some people can't receive target therapy following genetic guidance. This study was to explore the relevance between serum tumor markers and treatment of EGFR-TKIs.

methodsWe retrospectively collected the clinical information of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring EGFR mutation, who received EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy from June 2009 to June 2014 in Peking University Cancer Hospital, analyzed the relationship between serum tumor markers and efficacy of EGFR-TKIs.

resultsThe objective response rate (ORR) was 52.8% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 89.3%. The results showed that, patients with high CEA level before treatment responded better to TKIs (ORR 61.3% vs 35.9%, DCR 95.2% vs 74.4%, P<0.001). Similar phenomena was found in patients with CEA decreased 1 month later (61.5% vs 25%, P=0.002). Progression-free survival (PFS) significantly prolonged in patients with elevated baseline CEA (mPFS 9.8 mo vs 5.9 mo, P=0.027). To the opposite, PFS was significantly shorter in patients with elevated baseline CYFRA21-1 and CA125 (mPFS 9.0 mo vs 11.4 mo, P=0.029; 9.0 mo vs 11.5 mo, P=0.023, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0-1, normal baseline CYFRA21-1 and CEA decline predicted longer PFS. The overall survival (OS) was highly associated with elevated CYFRA21-1 and CA125 (median OS 25.1 mo vs 52.5 mo, P=0.003; 22.7 mo vs 55.0 mo, P<0.001, respectively), while independent of CEA.

conclusionsHigh level of baseline CEA and decline 1 month after treatment could predict the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. While high levels of baseline CYFRA21-1 and CA125 indicated shortened survival.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma of LungAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansKeratin-19Lung NeoplasmsMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisProtein Kinase Inhibitorsantigen CYFRA21.1Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenErbB ReceptorsKeratin-19Membrane ProteinsMUC16 protein, humanProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID28935011
PMCPMC5973368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.