ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2017
Multi-breed genomic prediction using Bayes R with sequence data and dropping variants with a small effect.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incorporating information of causal variants in genomic prediction using GBLUP or machine learning models in a simulated livestock population.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Dissecting the genetic and phenotypic basis of salinity tolerance in mungbean: insights from multi-stage phenotyping, GWAS and genomic prediction.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Genomic Predictions Cross Populations with Different Linkage Disequilibrium Patterns.Genes · 2024Article
- Article
- Genomic prediction based on preselected single-nucleotide polymorphisms from genome-wide association study and imputed whole-genome sequence data annotation for growth traits in Duroc pigs.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Multi-breed genomic evaluation for tropical beef cattle when no pedigree information is available.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Using pre-selected variants from large-scale whole-genome sequence data for single-step genomic predictions in pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Review
- Multi-line ssGBLUP evaluation using preselected markers from whole-genome sequence data in pigs.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Genomic prediction with whole-genome sequence data in intensely selected pig lines.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- Application of Bayesian genomic prediction methods to genome-wide association analyses.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Review
- Increased accuracy of genomic predictions for growth under chronic thermal stress in rainbow trout by prioritizing variants from GWAS using imputed sequence data.Evolutionary applications · 2022Article
- Genome-wide imputation using the practical haplotype graph in the heterozygous crop cassava.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Incorporating Omics Data in Genomic Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Imputation accuracy to whole-genome sequence in Nellore cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- On the use of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction and fine-scale mapping of QTL.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- The superiority of multi-trait models with genotype-by-environment interactions in a limited number of environments for genomic prediction in pigs.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2020Article
- Genomic prediction based on selected variants from imputed whole-genome sequence data in Australian sheep populations.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing availability of whole-genome sequence data is expected to increase the accuracy of genomic prediction. However, results from simulation studies and analysis of real data do not always show an increase in accuracy from sequence data compared to high-density (HD) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chip genotypes. In addition, the sheer number of variants makes analysis of all variants and accurate estimation of all effects computationally challenging. Our objective was to find a strategy to approximate the analysis of whole-sequence data with a Bayesian variable selection model. Using a simulated dataset, we applied a Bayes R hybrid model to analyse whole-sequence data, test the effect of dropping a proportion of variants during the analysis, and test how the analysis can be split into separate analyses per chromosome to reduce the elapsed computing time. We also investigated the effect of imputation errors on prediction accuracy. Subsequently, we applied the approach to a dataset that contained imputed sequences and records for production and fertility traits for 38,492 Holstein, Jersey, Australian Red and crossbred bulls and cows.
resultsWith the simulated dataset, we found that prediction accuracy was highly increased for a breed that was not represented in the training population for sequence data compared to HD SNP data. Either dropping part of the variants during the analysis or splitting the analysis into separate analyses per chromosome decreased accuracy compared to analysing whole-sequence data. First, dropping variants from each chromosome and reanalysing the retained variants together resulted in an accuracy similar to that obtained when analysing whole-sequence data. Adding imputation errors decreased prediction accuracy, especially for errors in the validation population. With real data, using sequence variants resulted in accuracies that were similar to those obtained with the HD SNPs.
conclusionsWe present an efficient approach to approximate analysis of whole-sequence data with a Bayesian variable selection model. The lack of increase in prediction accuracy when applied to real data could be due to imputation errors, which demonstrates the importance of developing more accurate methods of imputation or directly genotyping sequence variants that have a major effect in the prediction equation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.