Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28934895›Full record

ArticleJournal of intensive care medicine2020

High Early Fluid Input After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Combined Report of Association With Delayed Cerebral Ischemia and Feasibility of Cardiac Output-Guided Fluid Restriction.

Leonie J M Vergouw, Mohamud Egal, Bas Bergmans, Diederik W J Dippel, Hester F Lingsma, Mervyn D I Vergouwen, Peter W A Willems, Annemarie W Oldenbeuving, Jan Bakker, Mathieu van der Jagt

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intensive care medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage.Lancet (London, England) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Leonie J M VergouwDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mohamud EgalDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5225-3806
Bas BergmansDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Diederik W J DippelDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hester F LingsmaDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mervyn D I VergouwenDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter W A WillemsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Annemarie W OldenbeuvingDepartment of Intensive Care, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Jan BakkerDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mathieu van der JagtDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines on the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) recommend euvolemia, whereas hypervolemia may cause harm. We investigated whether high early fluid input is associated with delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), and if fluid input can be safely decreased using transpulmonary thermodilution (TPT).

methodsWe retrospectively included aSAH patients treated at an academic intensive care unit (2007-2011; cohort 1) or managed with TPT (2011-2013; cohort 2). Local guidelines recommended fluid input of 3 L daily. More fluids were administered when daily fluid balance fell below +500 mL. In cohort 2, fluid input in high-risk patients was guided by cardiac output measured by TPT per a strict protocol. Associations of fluid input and balance with DCI were analyzed with multivariable logistic regression (cohort 1), and changes in hemodynamic indices after institution of TPT assessed with linear mixed models (cohort 2).

resultsCumulative fluid input 0 to 72 hours after admission was associated with DCI in cohort 1 (n=223; odds ratio [OR] 1.19/L; 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.32), whereas cumulative fluid balance was not. In cohort 2 (23 patients), using TPT fluid input could be decreased from 6.0 ± 1.0 L before to 3.4 ± 0.3 L;

conclusionHigh early fluid input was associated with DCI. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring was feasible to reduce fluid input while maintaining preload. These results indicate that fluid loading beyond a normal preload occurs, may increase DCI risk, and can be minimized with TPT.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaCardiac OutputFeasibility StudiesFemaleFluid TherapyHemodynamicsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSubarachnoid HemorrhageWater-Electrolyte Balanceaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhagedelayed cerebral ischemiafluid managementhypervolemiatranspulmonary thermodilution

Identifiers

PMID28934895
PMCPMC6927070
OpenAlexW2757622061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.