Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28934434›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2017

High-Sensitivity Assays for Plasmodium falciparum Infection by Immuno-Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of PfIDEh and PfLDH Antigens.

Jianbing Mu, John F Andersen, Jesus G Valenzuela, Thomas E Wellems

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Dual, Systematic Approach to Malaria Diagnostic Biomarker Discovery.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Ultrasensitive ELISA for Accurate Detection ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Sensitive Immunoassay Detection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jianbing MuLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
John F AndersenLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jesus G ValenzuelaLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Thomas E WellemsLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Malaria Drug Resistance and Disease VirulenceZIAAI000483 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI WELLEMS, THOMAS E · 2009 to 2025
$24.5M
Molecular approaches to understand vector-host and vector-pathogen interactionsZIAAI000932 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI VALENZUELA, JESUS · 2009 to 2025
$23.1M
Vector-Borne Diseases: Molecular Mechanisms in Vector-Host InteractionsZIAAI001012 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI RIBEIRO, JOSE · 2009 to 2025
$9.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rapid diagnostic tests based on Plasmodium falciparum histidine-rich protein II (PfHRP-II) and P. falciparum lactate dehydrogenase (PfLDH) antigens are widely deployed for detection of P. falciparum infection; however, these tests often miss cases of low-level parasitemia, and PfHRP-II tests can give false-negative results when P. falciparum strains do not express this antigen. Methods: We screened proteomic data for highly expressed P. falciparum proteins and compared their features to those of PfHRP-II and PfLDH biomarkers. Search criteria included high levels of expression, conservation in all parasite strains, and good correlation of antigen levels with parasitemia and its clearance after drug treatment. Different assay methods were compared for sensitive detection of parasitemia in P. falciparum cultures. Results: Among potential new biomarkers, a P. falciparum homolog of insulin-degrading enzyme (PfIDEh) met our search criteria. Comparative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays with monoclonal antibodies against PfLDH or PfIDEh showed detection limits of 100-200 parasites/µL and 200-400 parasites/µL, respectively. Detection was dramatically improved by use of real-time immuno-polymerase chain reaction (PCR), to parasitemia limits of 0.02 parasite/µL and 0.78 parasite/µL in PfLDH- and PfIDEh-based assays, respectively. Conclusions: The ability of PfLDH- or PfIDEh-based immuno-PCR assays to detect <1 parasite/µL suggests that improvements of bound antibody sensor technology may greatly increase the sensitivity of malaria rapid diagnostic tests.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, ProtozoanComputational BiologyDNA FragmentationEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayLimit of DetectionL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMalaria, FalciparumMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPlasmodium falciparumPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, GeneticProteomicsProtozoan ProteinsRabbitsAntigens, ProtozoanHRP-2 antigen, Plasmodium falciparumL-Lactate DehydrogenaseProtozoan Proteinsenzyme-linked immunosorbent assayimmuno-PCRinsulin-degrading enzymelactate dehydrogenase enzymePfHRP-II

Identifiers

PMID28934434
PMCPMC5854022
OpenAlexW2741203587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.