Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28934339›Full record

ReviewPLoS pathogens2017

Bacterial toxins: Offensive, defensive, or something else altogether?

Justine K Rudkin, Rachel M McLoughlin, Andrew Preston, Ruth C Massey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS pathogens, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Comparative Characterization of a HypervirulentInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justine K RudkinSchool of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3044-0459
Rachel M McLoughlinHost-Pathogen Interactions Group, School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Andrew PrestonDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry and the Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1489-280X
Ruth C MasseyDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry and the Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8154-4039

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The secretion of proteins that damage host tissue is well established as integral to the infectious processes of many bacterial pathogens. However, recent advances in our understanding of the activity of toxins suggest that the attributes we have assigned to them from early in vitro experimentation have misled us into thinking of them as merely destructive tools. Here, we will discuss the multifarious ways in which toxins contribute to the lifestyle of bacteria and, by considering their activity from an evolutionary perspective, demonstrate how this extends far beyond their ability to destroy host tissue.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAdenylyl CyclasesAnimalsBacteriaBacterial ToxinsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansSuperantigensAdenylyl CyclasesBacterial ToxinsSuperantigens

Identifiers

PMID28934339
PMCPMC5608399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.