ArticlePloS one2017
Desert soil clay content estimation using reflectance spectroscopy preprocessed by fractional derivative.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting nickel concentration in soil using fractional-order derivative and visible-near-infrared spectroscopy indices.PloS one · 2024Article
- Study on Hyperspectral Monitoring Model of Total Flavonoids and Total Phenols in Tartary Buckwheat Grains.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Combining Fractional Derivatives and Machine Learning: A Review.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- Machine-learning-based quantitative estimation of soil organic carbon content by VIS/NIR spectroscopy.PeerJ · 2018Article
- Article
- Desert soil clay content estimation using reflectance spectroscopy preprocessed by fractional derivative.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective pretreatment of spectral reflectance is vital to model accuracy in soil parameter estimation. However, the classic integer derivative has some disadvantages, including spectral information loss and the introduction of high-frequency noise. In this paper, the fractional order derivative algorithm was applied to the pretreatment and partial least squares regression (PLSR) was used to assess the clay content of desert soils. Overall, 103 soil samples were collected from the Ebinur Lake basin in the Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region of China, and used as data sets for calibration and validation. Following laboratory measurements of spectral reflectance and clay content, the raw spectral reflectance and absorbance data were treated using the fractional derivative order from the 0.0 to the 2.0 order (order interval: 0.2). The ratio of performance to deviation (RPD), determinant coefficients of calibration ([Formula: see text]), root mean square errors of calibration (RMSEC), determinant coefficients of prediction ([Formula: see text]), and root mean square errors of prediction (RMSEP) were applied to assess the performance of predicting models. The results showed that models built on the fractional derivative order performed better than when using the classic integer derivative. Comparison of the predictive effects of 22 models for estimating clay content, calibrated by PLSR, showed that those models based on the fractional derivative 1.8 order of spectral reflectance ([Formula: see text] = 0.907, RMSEC = 0.425%, [Formula: see text] = 0.916, RMSEP = 0.364%, and RPD = 2.484 ≥ 2.000) and absorbance ([Formula: see text] = 0.888, RMSEC = 0.446%, [Formula: see text] = 0.918, RMSEP = 0.383% and RPD = 2.511 ≥ 2.000) were most effective. Furthermore, they performed well in quantitative estimations of the clay content of soils in the study area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.