Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28934228›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Knowledge about tuberculosis transmission and prevention and perceptions of health service utilization among index cases and contacts in Brazil: Understanding losses in the latent tuberculosis cascade of care.

Flavia Matos Salame, Márcia Danielle Ferreira, Marcia Teresa Belo, Eleny Guimarães Teixeira, Marcelo Cordeiro-Santos, Ricardo Arraes Ximenes, Maria de Fátima Militão de Albuquerque, Philip C Hill, Dick Menzies, Anete Trajman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Determinants of losses in the latent tuberculosis cascade of care in Brazil: A retrospective cohort study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Knowledge and perceptions of tuberculosis transmission and prevention among physicians and nurses in three Brazilian capitals with high incidence of tuberculosis.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Flavia Matos SalameFundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, AM, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5967-5094
Márcia Danielle FerreiraFundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, AM, Brazil.
Marcia Teresa BeloFundação Técnico-Educacional Souza Marques, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Eleny Guimarães TeixeiraFundação Técnico-Educacional Souza Marques, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Marcelo Cordeiro-SantosFundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, AM, Brazil.
Ricardo Arraes XimenesUniversidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Maria de Fátima Militão de AlbuquerqueInstituto de Pesquisa Aggeu Magalhães, Fiocruz, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Philip C HillCentre for International Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Dick MenziesGlobal Health Program, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Anete TrajmanGlobal Health Program, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTuberculosis contacts are candidates for active and latent tuberculosis infection screening and eventual treatment. However, many losses occur in the different steps of the contacts' cascade of care. Reasons for this are poorly understood.

objectiveTo describe the different steps where losses in the contact cascade occur and to explore knowledge and attitudes regarding tuberculosis transmission/prevention and perceptions about tuberculosis services in order to understand the reasons for losses from the tuberculosis service users' perspective.

designWe collected routine data from the index case and contact registry books and from patients' records to build the cascade of care of contacts in 12 health facilities in three Brazilian cities with high tuberculosis incidence rates. During a knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) survey, trained interviewers administered a semi-structured questionnaire to 138 index cases and 98 contacts.

resultsMost of the losses in the cascade occurred in the first two steps (contact identification, 43% and tuberculin skin testing placement, 91% of the identified contacts). Among KAP-interviewed contacts, 67% knew how tuberculosis is transmitted, 87% knew its key symptoms and 81% declared they would take preventive therapy if prescribed. Among KAP-interviewed index cases, 67% knew they could spread tuberculosis, 70% feared for the health of their families and 88% would like their family to be evaluated in the same services.

conclusionOnly a small proportion of contacts are evaluated for active and latent tuberculosis, despite their-and their index cases'-reasonable knowledge, positive attitudes towards prevention and satisfaction with tuberculosis services. In these services, education of service users would not be a sufficient solution. Healthcare workers' and managers' perspective, not explored in this study, may bring more light to this subject.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultBrazilFemaleHealth ServicesHumansLatent TuberculosisMaleMiddle AgedPatient CareSurveys and QuestionnairesUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID28934228
PMCPMC5608201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.