Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28934178›Full record

GuidelineMMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report2017

Update to CDC's U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016: Revised Recommendations for the Use of Hormonal Contraception Among Women at High Risk for HIV Infection.

Naomi K Tepper, Jamie W Krashin, Kathryn M Curtis, Shanna Cox, Maura K Whiteman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naomi K TepperDiv of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.
Jamie W KrashinDiv of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.
Kathryn M CurtisDiv of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.
Shanna CoxDiv of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.
Maura K WhitemanDiv of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CDC's U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) (first published in 2010 and updated in 2016) provides evidence-based guidance for the safe use of contraceptive methods among U.S. women with certain characteristics or medical conditions (1), and is adapted from global guidance from the World Health Organization (WHO) and kept up to date based on continual review of published literature (2).* CDC recently evaluated the evidence and the updated WHO guidance on the risk for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) acquisition among women using hormonal contraception.

Indexed as

Eligibility DeterminationCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Contraceptives, Oral, HormonalFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedRiskUnited StatesContraceptives, Oral, Hormonal

Identifiers

PMID28934178
PMCPMC5657782
OpenAlexW2757368580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.