Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28934111›Full record

ArticleNutrients2017

Breakfast and Breakfast Cereal Choice and Its Impact on Nutrient and Sugar Intakes and Anthropometric Measures among a Nationally Representative Sample of Australian Children and Adolescents.

Flavia Fayet-Moore, Andrew McConnell, Kate Tuck, Peter Petocz

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Flavia Fayet-MooreNutrition Research Australia, Level 13 167 Macquarie Street, Sydney 2000, Australia. flavia@nraus.com.
Andrew McConnellNutrition Research Australia, Level 13 167 Macquarie Street, Sydney 2000, Australia. andrew@nraus.com.
Kate TuckNutrition Research Australia, Level 13 167 Macquarie Street, Sydney 2000, Australia. kate@nraus.com.
Peter PetoczDepartment of Statistics, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia. peter.petocz@mq.edu.au.
Macquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited evidence in Australia that compares the nutritional impact of a breakfast cereal breakfast to a non-cereal breakfast, and includes the type of cereal. This study investigated the impact of breakfast choice and the total sugar content of breakfast cereal on nutrient intakes and anthropometric measures among Australian children and adolescents. Data from 2 to 18-year-old in the 2011-2012 National Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey were used (

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorAnthropometryBreakfastChild BehaviorChoice BehaviorEdible GrainFeeding BehaviorNutritive ValueAdolescentAge FactorsAustraliaBody Mass IndexChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDietary FiberDietary FiberDietary SugarsadolescentBMIbreakfastcerealchildrenNational Nutrition Surveynutrientsugars

Identifiers

PMID28934111
PMCPMC5691662
OpenAlexW2760239702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.