Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28934092›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2017

Insecticide Use and Breast Cancer Risk among Farmers' Wives in the Agricultural Health Study.

Lawrence S Engel, Emily Werder, Jaya Satagopan, Aaron Blair, Jane A Hoppin, Stella Koutros, Catherine C Lerro, Dale P Sandler, Michael C Alavanja, Laura E Beane Freeman

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
21.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lawrence S EngelDepartment of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Emily WerderDepartment of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Jaya SatagopanDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, New York, USA.
Aaron BlairDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) , Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jane A HoppinDepartment of Biological Sciences, and.
Stella KoutrosDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) , Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Catherine C LerroDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) , Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Dale P SandlerEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH, DHHS , Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Michael C AlavanjaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) , Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Laura E Beane FreemanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) , Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USNorth Carolina State University · US

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Studies of Occupational Cancer (Pesticides)ZIACP010119 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI BEANE FREEMAN, LAURA · 2009 to 2025
$46.1M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Health Effects Of Exposures In AgricultureZIAES049030 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANDLER, DALE P · 2009 to 2025
$11.2M
STUDIES OF OCCUPATIONAL CANCER--PESTICIDESZ01CP010119 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI ALAVANJA, MICHAEL · 1996 to 2008
$5.0M
Study of exposures and biomarkers in cancer epidemiologyR01CA197402 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SATAGOPAN, JAYA M · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
HEALTH EFFECTS OF EXPOSURES IN AGRICULTUREZ01ES049030 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SANDLER, DALE P · 1997 to 2008
$889k
Pesticide Use & Breast Cancer Risk in Large Cohort of Female Agriculture WorkersR03CA137824 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SATAGOPAN, JAYA M · 2009 to 2010
$190k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CP010119Intramural NIH HHS Z01 ES049030NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197402NCI NIH HHS R03 CA137824NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome epidemiologic and laboratory studies suggest that insecticides are related to increased breast cancer risk, but the evidence is inconsistent. Women engaged in agricultural work or who reside in agricultural areas may experience appreciable exposures to a wide range of insecticides.

objectiveWe examined associations between insecticide use and breast cancer incidence among wives of pesticide applicators (farmers) in the prospective Agricultural Health Study.

methodsFarmers and their wives provided information on insecticide use, demographics, and reproductive history at enrollment in 1993-1997 and in 5-y follow-up interviews. Cancer incidence was determined via cancer registries. Among 30,594 wives with no history of breast cancer before enrollment, we examined breast cancer risk in relation to the women's and their husbands' insecticide use using Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsDuring an average 14.7-y follow-up, 39% of the women reported ever using insecticides, and 1,081 were diagnosed with breast cancer. Although ever use of insecticides overall was not associated with breast cancer risk, risk was elevated among women who had ever used the organophosphates chlorpyrifos [HR=1.4 (95% CI: 1.0, 2.0)] or terbufos [HR=1.5 (95% CI: 1.0, 2.1)], with nonsignificantly increased risks for coumaphos [HR=1.5 (95% CI: 0.9, 2.5)] and heptachlor [HR=1.5 (95% CI: 0.7, 2.9)]. Risk in relation to the wives' use was associated primarily with premenopausal breast cancer. We found little evidence of differential risk by tumor estrogen receptor status. Among women who did not apply pesticides, the husband's use of fonofos was associated with elevated risk, although no exposure-response trend was observed.

conclusionUse of several organophosphate insecticides was associated with elevated breast cancer risk. However, associations for the women's and husbands' use of these insecticides showed limited concordance. Ongoing cohort follow-up may help clarify the relationship, if any, between individual insecticide exposures and breast cancer risk. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1295.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAgricultureAgrochemicalsBreast NeoplasmsFarmersFemaleHumansIncidenceInsecticidesMiddle AgedOccupational ExposureOrganophosphatesAgrochemicalsInsecticidesOrganophosphates

Identifiers

PMID28934092
PMCPMC5915194
OpenAlexW2758731328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.