ArticlePrion2017
Manipulating the aggregation activity of human prion-like proteins.
Article in Prion, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exogenous prion-like proteins and their potential to trigger cognitive dysfunction.Molecular systems biology · 2025Article
- N-terminal region of Drosophila melanogaster Argonaute2 forms amyloid-like aggregates.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Prevalence and species distribution of the low-complexity, amyloid-like, reversible, kinked segment structural motif in amyloid-like fibrils.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2021Article
- Natural and pathogenic protein sequence variation affecting prion-like domains within and across human proteomes.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Aggregation and degradation scales for prion-like domains: sequence features and context weigh in.Current genetics · 2019Review
- Conservation of Prion-Like Composition and Sequence in Prion-Formers and Prion-Like Proteins ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Considerable advances in understanding the protein features favoring prion formation in yeast have facilitated the development of effective yeast prion prediction algorithms. Here we discuss a recent study in which we systematically explored the utility of the yeast prion prediction algorithm PAPA for designing mutations to modulate the aggregation activity of the human prion-like protein hnRNPA2B1. Mutations in hnRNPA2B1 cause multisystem proteinopathy in humans, and accelerate aggregation of the protein in vitro. Additionally, mutant hnRNPA2B1 forms cytoplasmic inclusions when expressed in Drosophila, and the mutant prion-like domain can substitute for a portion of a yeast prion domain in supporting prion activity in yeast. PAPA was quite successful at predicting the effects of PrLD mutations on prion activity in yeast and on in vitro aggregation propensity. Additionally, PAPA successfully predicted the effects of most, but not all, mutations in the PrLD of the hnRNPA2B1 protein when expressed in Drosophila. These results suggest that PAPA is quite effective at predicting the effects of mutations on intrinsic aggregation propensity, but that intracellular factors can influence aggregation and prion-like activity in vivo. A more complete understanding of these intracellular factors may inform the next generation of prion prediction algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.