Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28933999›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2017

Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Lymphoma: Methods and Applications.

Alex F Herrera, Philippe Armand

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04237168 (Non-invasive Tumor Immunoglobulin Gene Next Generation Sequencing), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04237168 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Non-invasive Tumor Immunoglobulin Gene Next Generation Sequencing (IgNGS) in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL): Prognostic Implications and Assessment of Tumor Response

TypeobservationalSponsorFundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauRan2020 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseArmsIgNGS from circulating tumor DNA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Could treatment modification based on early response assessment improve results in DLBCL?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Diagnostic Value ofContrast media & molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alex F HerreraAlex F. Herrera, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; and Philippe Armand, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Philippe ArmandAlex F. Herrera, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA; and Philippe Armand, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
City Of Hope National Medical Center · US

Funding

Transplant for Lymphoma:Therapy-Related LeukemiaP50CA107399 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE/BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI FORMAN, STEPHEN J, KWAK, LARRY W · 2004 to 2022
$35.5M
Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA001727 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI MORTIMER, JOANNE E. · 1992 to 2024
$14.6M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA001727NCI NIH HHS P50 CA107399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Standard methods for disease response assessment in patients with lymphoma, including positron emission tomography and computed tomography scans, are imperfect. In other hematologic malignancies, particularly leukemias, the ability to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) is increasingly influencing treatment paradigms. However, in many subtypes of lymphoma, the application of MRD assessment techniques, like flow cytometry or polymerase chain reaction-based methods, has been challenging because of the absence of readily detected circulating disease or canonic chromosomal translocations. Newer MRD detection methods that use next-generation sequencing have yielded promising results in a number of lymphoma subtypes, fueling the hope that MRD detection may soon be applicable in clinical practice for most patients with lymphoma. MRD assessment can provide real-time information about tumor burden and response to therapy, noninvasive genomic profiling, and monitoring of clonal dynamics, allowing for many possible applications that could significantly affect the care of patients with lymphoma. Further validation of MRD assessment methods, including the incorporation of MRD assessment into clinical trials in patients with lymphoma, will be critical to determine how best to deploy MRD testing in routine practice and whether MRD assessment can ultimately bring us closer to the goal of personalized lymphoma care. In this review article, we describe the methods available for detecting MRD in patients with lymphoma and their relative advantages and disadvantages. We discuss preliminary results supporting the potential applications for MRD testing in the care of patients with lymphoma and strategies for including MRD assessment in lymphoma clinical trials.

Indexed as

FemaleFlow CytometryHumansLymphomaMaleNeoplasm, ResidualPolymerase Chain ReactionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID28933999
PMCPMC5707209
OpenAlexW2758939411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.