Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28933940›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2018

An Assessment of Primary Care and Pulmonary Provider Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening.

Matthew Triplette, Erin K Kross, Blake A Mann, Joann G Elmore, Christopher G Slatore, Shahida Shahrir, Perrin E Romine, Paul D Frederick, Kristina Crothers

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04083859 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Pragmatic Randomized-Controlled Trial of a Digital Outreach Intervention for Lung Cancer Screening: mPATH-Lung (Mobile Patient Technology for Health-Lung)

TypeinterventionalSponsorWake Forest University Health SciencesRan2022 to 2024Enrolled26,998ConditionsLung CancerArmsmPATH-Lung, Lung health video
NCT07073898 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Population Health Management Approaches to Increase Lung Cancer Screening in Community Health Centers - UG3 Pilot Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2025 to 2026Enrolled65ConditionsLung CancerArmsRepeated Text Messages (TM+), Conversational Agent (CA), Educational Video, Proactive Patient Navigation (PPN), Reactive Patient Navigation (RPN)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Factors associated with lung cancer risk factor documentation.The American journal of managed care · 2023
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Outcomes of Shared Decision-Making for Low-Dose Screening for Lung Cancer in an Academic Medical Center.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matthew Triplette1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0001-7421-4720
Erin K Kross1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Blake A Mann2 Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.
Joann G Elmore1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Christopher G Slatore3 Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon; and.
Shahida Shahrir1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Perrin E Romine1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Paul D Frederick1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Kristina Crothers1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

RESPIRATORY RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32HL007287 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kristina Anne Crothers, David J. Horne · 1985 to 2026
$16.7M
Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening in HIV InfectionR01CA173754 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRAITHWAITE, RONALD SCOTT, CROTHERS, KRISTINA ANNE · 2013 to 2017
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA173754NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007287
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleLung cancer screening has a mortality benefit to high-risk smokers, but implementation remains suboptimal. Providers represent the key entry point to screening, and an understanding of provider perspectives on lung cancer screening is necessary to improve referral and overall implementation.

objectivesThe objective of this study was to understand knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, barriers, and facilitators to screening in a diverse group of referring pulmonologists and primary care providers.

methodsWe conducted an electronic survey of primary care and pulmonary providers within a tertiary care medical center across different practice sites. The survey covered the following domains: 1) beliefs and assessment of evidence, 2) knowledge of lung cancer screening and guidelines, 3) current screening practices, 4) barriers and facilitators, and 5) demographic and practice characteristics.

resultsThe 196 participants included 80% primary care clinicians and 19% pulmonologists (1% others). Forty-one percent practiced at university-based or affiliated clinics, 47% at county hospital-based clinics, and 12% at other or unidentified sites. The majority endorsed lung cancer screening effectiveness (74%); however, performance on knowledge-based assessments of screening eligibility, documentation, and nodule management was suboptimal. Key barriers included inadequate time (36%), inadequate staffing (36%), and patients having too many other illnesses to address screening (38%). Decision aids, which are used at the point of referral, were commonly identified both as important lung cancer screening clinical facilitators (51%) and as provider knowledge facilitators (59%). There were several differences by provider specialty, including primary care providers more frequently reporting time constraints and their patients having too many other illnesses to address screening as significant barriers to lung cancer screening.

conclusionsProviders endorsed the benefits of lung cancer screening, but there are limitations in provider knowledge of key screening components. The most frequently reported barriers to screening represent a lack of clinical time or resources to address lung cancer screening in clinical practice. Facilitators for nodule management as well as point-of-care referral materials may be helpful in reducing knowledge gaps and the clinical burden of referral. These are all modifiable factors, which could be addressed to increase screening referral. Differences in attitudes and barriers by specialty should also be considered to optimize screening implementation.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesWashingtonattitudes of health personnelearly detection of cancerlung cancerpulmonary nodule

Identifiers

PMID28933940
PMCPMC5822418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.