Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28933682›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2017

Q-vaxcelerate: A distributed development approach for a new Coxiella burnetii vaccine.

Patrick M Reeves, Susan Raju Paul, Ann E Sluder, Timothy A Brauns, Mark C Poznansky

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recent Advances on the Innate Immune Response toFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. PromiscuousFrontiers in immunology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Zoonoses under our noses.Microbes and infection
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick M Reevesa Vaccine and Immunotherapy Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , MA , USA.
Susan Raju Paula Vaccine and Immunotherapy Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , MA , USA.
Ann E Sludera Vaccine and Immunotherapy Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , MA , USA.
Timothy A Braunsa Vaccine and Immunotherapy Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , MA , USA.
Mark C Poznanskya Vaccine and Immunotherapy Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine , Massachusetts General Hospital , Boston , MA , USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of vaccines that are both safe and effective remains a costly and time-consuming challenge. To accelerate the pace of development and improve the efficacy and safety of candidate vaccines for both existing and emerging infectious agents, we have used a distributed development approach. This features the managed integration of individual expert groups having the requisite vaccine platforms, pre-clinical models, assays, skills and knowledge pertinent to a specific pathogen into a single, end-to-end development team capable of producing a new vaccine tailored to that particular agent. Distributed development focuses on integrating existing effort across multiple institutions rather than developing new capabilities or consolidating resources within an individual organization. Previously we have used the distributed development strategy to generate vaccine candidates for emerging viral diseases. Coxiella burnetii is a highly infectious and resilient bacterium and the causative agent of Q fever. Treatment for Q fever can require months of antibiotics. The current vaccine for Q-fever is only approved in Australia and requires prescreening due to the potential for severe reactogenicity in previously exposed individuals. Here we discuss Q-VaxCelerate, a distributed development consortium for the development of a new vaccine to prevent Q fever.

Indexed as

Bacterial VaccinesCoxiella burnetiiDrug DiscoveryHumansQ FeverBacterial VaccinesCoxiella burnetiidistribute developmentpeptideQfeversubunitvaccine

Identifiers

PMID28933682
PMCPMC5718828
OpenAlexW2759843578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.