Erratum: Genome-scale activation screen identifies a lncRNA locus regulating a gene neighbourhood.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. The Role of Long Non-coding RNAs in Sepsis-Induced Cardiac Dysfunction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
   Review
2. Using RNA sequencing to identify a putative lncRNA-associated ceRNA network in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.RNA biology · 2020
   Article
3. Genome-wide analyses reveal the role of noncoding variation in complex traits during rice domestication.Science advances · 2019
   Article
4. Genome-wide CRISPR Screen to Identify Genes that Suppress Transformation in the Presence of Endogenous KrasScientific reports · 2019
   Article
5. The C9orf72-interacting protein Smcr8 is a negative regulator of autoimmunity and lysosomal exocytosis.Genes & development · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  Genome-scale activation screen identifies a lncRNA locus regulating a gene neighbourhood.2017

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract