Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28933424›Full record

ArticleActa pharmacologica Sinica2018

The efficacy and safety of cilostazol as an alternative to aspirin in Chinese patients with aspirin intolerance after coronary stent implantation: a combined clinical study and computational system pharmacology analysis.

Ying Xue, Zhi-Wei Feng, Xiao-Ye Li, Zi-Heng Hu, Qing Xu, Zi Wang, Jia-Hui Cheng, Hong-Tao Shi, Qi-Bing Wang, Hong-Yi Wu and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Cilostazol combined with P2YClinical cardiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Insight intoACS omega · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ying XueDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Zhi-Wei FengDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy; NIH National Center of Excellence for Computational Drug Abuse Research; Drug Discovery Institute; Departments of Computational Biology and Structural Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Xiao-Ye LiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Zi-Heng HuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy; NIH National Center of Excellence for Computational Drug Abuse Research; Drug Discovery Institute; Departments of Computational Biology and Structural Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Qing XuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Zi WangSchool of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai 201203, China.
Jia-Hui ChengDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Hong-Tao ShiDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Qi-Bing WangDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Hong-Yi WuDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Xiang-Qun XieDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Computational Chemical Genomics Screening Center, School of Pharmacy; NIH National Center of Excellence for Computational Drug Abuse Research; Drug Discovery Institute; Departments of Computational Biology and Structural Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Qian-Zhou LvDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Fudan University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNZhongshan Hospital · CNNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USGenomics (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

NIDA Center of Excellence OF Computational Drug Abuse Research (CDAR)P30DA035778 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET, XIE, XIANG-QUN · 2014 to 2018
$5.4M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA035778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT) with aspirin and clopidogrel is the standard regimen to achieve rapid platelet inhibition and prevent thrombotic events. Currently, little information is available regarding alternative antiplatelet therapy in patients with an allergy or intolerance to aspirin. Although cilostazol is already a common alternative to aspirin in clinical practice in China, its efficacy and safety remain to be determined. We retrospectively analyzed 613 Chinese patients who had undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among them, 405 patients received standard DAT (aspirin plus clopidogrel) and 205 patients were identified with intolerance to aspirin and received alternative DAT (cilostazol plus clopidogrel). There were no significant differences between the two groups in their baseline clinical characteristics. The main outcomes of the study included major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and bleeding events during 12 months of follow-up. The MACEs endpoint was reached in 10 of 205 patients treated with cilostazol (4.9%) and in 34 of 408 patients treated with aspirin (8.3%). No statistically significant difference was observed in MACEs between the two groups. However, patients in the cilostazol group had less restenosis than did patients in the aspirin group (1.5% vs 4.9%, P=0.035). The occurrence of bleeding events tended to be lower in the cilostazol group (0.49% vs 2.7%, P=0.063). These clinical observations were further analyzed using network system pharmacology analysis, and the outcomes were consistent with clinical observations and preclinical data reports. We conclude that in Chinese patients with aspirin intolerance undergoing coronary stent implantation, the combination of clopidogrel with cilostazol may be an efficacious and safe alternative to the standard DAT regimen.

Indexed as

Drug-Eluting StentsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAgedAsian PeopleAspirinChinaCilostazolClopidogrelCoronary RestenosisData Interpretation, StatisticalDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Docking SimulationAspirinCilostazolClopidogrelDrug CombinationsPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTetrazolesTiclopidine

Identifiers

PMID28933424
PMCPMC5800472
OpenAlexW2759292323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.