Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28933347›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2017

Employer-Sponsored Plan Expenditures for Infants Born Preterm.

Scott D Grosse, Norman J Waitzman, Ninee Yang, Karon Abe, Wanda D Barfield

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Speculum-free portable preterm imaging system.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Medicaid and moms: the potential impact of extending medicaid coverage to mothers for 1 year after delivery.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Maternal Health Services Set Toolkit for Pharmacists.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Estimates of healthcare spending for preterm and low-birthweight infants in a commercially insured population: 2008-2016.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Scott D GrosseNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, sgrosse@cdc.gov.
Norman J WaitzmanDepartment of Economics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Ninee YangNational Center for Health Statistics, and.
Karon AbeNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities.
Wanda D BarfieldDivision of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; and.
National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities · USNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion · USNational Center for Health Statistics · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCare for infants born preterm or with major birth defects is costly. Specific estimates of financial burden for different payers are lacking, in part because use of administrative data to identify preterm infants and costs is challenging.

methodsWe used private health insurance claims data and billing codes to identify live births during 2013 and calculated first-year expenditures for employer-sponsored health plans for infants born preterm, both overall and stratified by major birth defects.

resultsWe conservatively estimated that 7.7% of insured infants born preterm accounted for 37% of $2.0 billion spent by participating plans on the care of infants born during 2013. With a mean difference in plan expenditures of ∼$47 100 per infant, preterm births cost the included plans an extra $600 million during the first year of life. Extrapolating to the national level, we projected aggregate employer-sponsored plan expenditures of $6 billion for infants born preterm during 2013. Infants with major birth defects accounted for 5.8% of preterm births but 24.5% of expenditures during infancy. By using an alternative algorithm to identify preterm infants, it was revealed that incremental expenditures were higher: $78 000 per preterm infant and $14 billion nationally.

conclusionPreterm births (especially in conjunction with major birth defects) represent a substantial burden on payers, and efforts to mitigate this burden are needed. In addition, researchers need to conduct studies using linked vital records, birth defects surveillance, and administrative data to accurately and longitudinally assess per-infant costs attributable to preterm birth and the interaction of preterm birth with major birth defects.

Indexed as

Congenital AbnormalitiesDatabases, FactualHealth Benefit Plans, EmployeeHealth ExpendituresHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28933347
PMCPMC6029853
OpenAlexW2757213082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.