Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28932975›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2017

The effect of a geriatric evaluation on treatment decisions for older patients with colorectal cancer.

N M Verweij, E T D Souwer, A H W Schiphorst, H A Maas, J E A Portielje, A Pronk, F van den Bos, M E Hamaker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

N M VerweijDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands. nverweij@diakhuis.nl.
E T D SouwerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
A H W SchiphorstDepartment of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
H A MaasDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
J E A PortieljeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
A PronkDepartment of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
F van den BosDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands.
M E HamakerDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreating elderly colorectal cancer patients can be challenging. It is very important to carefully weigh the risks and benefits of potential treatments in individual patients. This treatment decision making can be guided by geriatric consultation. Our aim was to assess the effect of a geriatric evaluation on treatment decisions for older patients with colorectal cancer.

methodsColorectal cancer patients who were referred for a geriatric consultation between 2013 and 2015 in three Dutch teaching hospitals were included in a prospective database. The outcome of geriatric assessment, non-oncological interventions and geriatricians' treatment recommendations were evaluated.

resultsThe total number of included referrals was 168. The median age was 81 years (range 60-94). Most patients (71%) had colon cancer and 49% had tumour stage III disease. The reason for geriatric consultation was uncertainty regarding the optimal oncologic treatment in 139 patients (83%). Overall 93% of patients suffered from geriatric impairments; non-oncological interventions that followed after geriatric consultation was mostly aimed at malnutrition. The geriatrician recommended the 'more intensive treatment' option in 69% and the 'less intensive treatment' option in 31% of which 63% 'supportive care only'.

conclusionGeriatric consultation can be useful in treatment decision making in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. It may lead to changes in the treatment plan for individual cases and may result in an additional optimisation of patient's health status prior to treatment.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overClinical Decision-MakingFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleNeoplasm StagingNetherlandsPatient Care PlanningPatient SelectionReferral and ConsultationRisk AdjustmentRisk AssessmentColorectal cancerDecision makingGeriatric consultation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.