Trial reportTechniques in coloproctology2017
A prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating the short-term outcomes of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus tissue-selecting technique.
Trial report in Techniques in coloproctology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- A systematic review of the literature assessing the outcomes of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus open haemorrhoidectomy.Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Pooled it
- Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circumferential Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III to IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial.Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2019Trial
- Ruiyun procedure for hemorrhoids versus tissue-selective therapy stapler for grade II-III hemorrhoids: an exploratory retrospective comparative study.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- The comparison of doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation and the tissue selecting technique for patients with grade III/IV haemorrhoids: a retrospective cohort study.Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- PROSPECT guideline for haemorrhoid surgery: A systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2023Article
- Outcomes of Modified Tissue Selection Therapy Stapler in the Treatment of Prolapsing Hemorrhoids.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Short-term outcomes of transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization versus tissue-selecting technique.Techniques in coloproctology · 2018Article
- A prospective randomized trial on transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus stapler hemorrhoidectomy: methodological issues that need to be clarified.Techniques in coloproctology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTissue-selecting technique (TST) is a novel stapled hemorrhoidectomy technique which targets the hemorrhoids, leaving uninvolved mucosal bridges intact and avoiding circumferential circular stapling. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term outcomes of TST and transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD).
methodsPatients presenting with symptomatic hemorrhoids were recruited. Patients were randomized into two groups: (1) TST and (2) THD. Patient demographics, perioperative data, postoperative pain scores, recurrence and patient satisfaction scores were evaluated. Patients with acute thrombosed hemorrhoids, external hemorrhoids only, or other concomitant anal diseases were excluded.
resultsFrom January 2013 to December 2015, 80 patients were included in the study, 40 in each group. There were no significant differences between groups as regards demographic data, perioperative data and postoperative pain scores. The median symptom scores for bleeding and prolapse were significantly lower in the TST group at 1 year (bleeding 1 vs. 2, p = 0.001; prolapse 1 vs. 2, p = 0.025). There was significantly less recurrence requiring reintervention in the TST group (4/40 vs. 17/40, p = 0.001). Satisfaction was significantly greater after TST. The median satisfaction scores after TST and THD were 4 and 3 (on a scale of 1-4; 4 = excellent satisfaction) (p < 0.00001), respectively.
conclusionsBoth THD and TST are safe, and they appear to have similar short-term outcomes; however, TST is associated with better improvement in symptoms, lower recurrence rates and greater patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.