Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28932904›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics and genomics : MGG2018

A computational method using the random walk with restart algorithm for identifying novel epigenetic factors.

JiaRui Li, Lei Chen, ShaoPeng Wang, YuHang Zhang, XiangYin Kong, Tao Huang, Yu-Dong Cai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Investigation of miRNA and mRNA Co-expression Network in Ependymoma.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

JiaRui LiSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, People's Republic of China.
Lei ChenCollege of Information Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, 201306, People's Republic of China.
ShaoPeng WangSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, People's Republic of China.
YuHang ZhangInstitute of Health Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China.
XiangYin KongInstitute of Health Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China. xykong@sibs.ac.cn.
Tao HuangInstitute of Health Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China. tohuangtao@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1975-9693
Yu-Dong CaiSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, People's Republic of China. cai_yud@126.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 31371335National Natural Science Foundation of China 31701151Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 17ZR1412500Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences 2016245
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic regulation has long been recognized as a significant factor in various biological processes, such as development, transcriptional regulation, spermatogenesis, and chromosome stabilization. Epigenetic alterations lead to many human diseases, including cancer, depression, autism, and immune system defects. Although efforts have been made to identify epigenetic regulators, it remains a challenge to systematically uncover all the components of the epigenetic regulation in the genome level using experimental approaches. The advances of constructing protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks provide an excellent opportunity to identify novel epigenetic factors computationally in the genome level. In this study, we identified potential epigenetic factors by using a computational method that applied the random walk with restart (RWR) algorithm on a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network using reported epigenetic factors as seed nodes. False positives were identified by their specific roles in the PPI network or by a low-confidence interaction and a weak functional relationship with epigenetic regulators. After filtering out the false positives, 26 candidate epigenetic factors were finally accessed. According to previous studies, 22 of these are thought to be involved in epigenetic regulation, suggesting the robustness of our method. Our study provides a novel computational approach which successfully identified 26 potential epigenetic factors, paving the way on deepening our understandings on the epigenetic mechanism.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAlgorithmsComputational BiologyGene Expression RegulationHumansProtein Interaction MapsEpigenetic factorEpigenetic regulationProtein–protein interaction networkRandom walk with restart

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.