Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28932728›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical treatment and research2017

Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy versus duodenal stenting in unresectable gastric cancer with gastric outlet obstruction.

Sa-Hong Min, Sang-Yong Son, Do-Hyun Jung, Chang-Min Lee, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Do Joong Park, Hyung-Ho Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical treatment and research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Treatment Strategies for Gastric Cancer Patients with Gastric Outlet Obstruction].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Treatment option of endoscopic stent insertion or gastrojejunostomy for gastric outlet obstruction due to gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sa-Hong MinDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Sang-Yong SonDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Do-Hyun JungDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Chang-Min LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Sang-Hoon AhnDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Do Joong ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Hyung-Ho KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the outcome between laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LapGJ) and duodenal stenting (DS) in terms of oral intake, nutritional status, patency duration, effect on chemotherapy and survival.

methodsMedical records of 115 patients, who had LapGJ or duodenal stent placement between July 2005 and September 2015 in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, have been reviewed retrospectively. Oral intake was measured with Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System. Serum albumin and body weight was measured as indicators of nutritional status. The duration of patency was measured until the date of reintervention. Chemotherapy effect was calculated after the procedures. Survival period and oral intake was analyzed by propensity score matching age, sex, T-stage, comorbidities, and chemotherapy status.

resultsForty-three LapGJ patients and 58 DS patients were enrolled. Improvement in oral intake was shown in LapGJ group versus DS group (88%

conclusionDS can provide faster symptom relief but LapGJ can provide improved oral intake, better compliance to chemotherapy, and longer survival. Therefore, LapGJ should be the first choice in gastric outlet obstruction patients for long-term and better quality of life.

Indexed as

Gastric outlet obstructionGastrojejunostomyLaparoscopyStentsStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID28932728
PMCPMC5597536
OpenAlexW2755171125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.