ArticleGerms2017
Evaluation of clinicians' reporting proficiency and their risk perceptions of Ebola virus disease in Ebonyi State, Nigeria.
Article in Germs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Readiness To Manage Ebola Virus Disease Among Emergency Healthcare Workers in Uganda: A Nationwide Multicenter Survey.Research square · 2024Article
- Evaluation of clinicians' knowledge of and attitudes to Ebola virus disease in Ebonyi State, Nigeria.Journal of virus eradication · 2019Article
- Assessment of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions regarding Ebola disease in healthcare workers from a tertiary care hospital in Romania.Public health · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEbola virus disease (EVD) is a highly contagious infection with a high case fatality rate. Thus, there is a crucial need for early detection and reporting of any individual suspected to have EVD in order to facilitate containment strategies. The aim of our study was to evaluate clinicians' reporting proficiency and their risk perceptions of EVD in Ebonyi State, Nigeria.
methodsWe performed a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted among clinicians. Consenting clinicians completed a structured questionnaire on the reporting of and their risk perceptions about EVD. Predictors of reporting proficiency and risk perceptions of EVD were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis.
resultsA total of 398 clinicians completed the survey, 312 (78.4%) were male. The average duration of the respondent's clinical practice was 5.0, 8.0, and 8.9 years for those working in primary, secondary and tertiary hospitals, respectively. The overall mean±SD knowledge score for proficiency in reporting was 4.4±0.6 (out of a maximum of 5), and 380 (95.5%) of the respondents had a good knowledge of the modalities of reporting suspected EVD cases. The overall mean±SD risk perception score was 5.6±1.2 (out of a maximum of 10) and only 202 (50.8%) of the respondents had accurate risk estimates towards EVD control. Only male sex was a predictor of accurate risk perception of EVD (aOR 1.7, 95%CI: 1.1-2.9).
conclusionThere was a high level of knowledge of reporting modalities regarding EVD among the clinicians; however, only approximately half of them had accurate risk perception towards EVD. The gaps identified should inform post-EVD control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.