Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28932605›Full record

ReviewAdvances in preventive medicine2017

Is Dementia Screening of Apparently Healthy Individuals Justified?

Larry W Chambers, Saskia Sivananthan, Carol Brayne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in preventive medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of national cognitive screening on dementia care and hospitalization in South Korea.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dementia Literacy and Willingness to Dementia Screening.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Role of the family physician in dementia care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2018
    Article
  18. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Larry W ChambersDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2983-1505
Saskia SivananthanPrimary Health Services Division, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4347-6346
Carol BrayneCambridge Institute of Public Health, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5307-663X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite efforts to raise awareness and develop guidelines for care of individuals with dementia, reports of poor detection and inadequate management persist. This has led to a call for more identification of people with dementia, that is, screening individuals who may or may not complain of symptoms of dementia in both acute settings and primary care. The following should be considered before recommending screening for dementia among individuals in the general population.

Identifiers

PMID28932605
PMCPMC5591898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.