ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2017
Assessment of pulmonary microstructural changes by hyperpolarized
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precision treatment of COPD based on novel imaging phenotypes: a treatable traits approach.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- Imaging in animal models: bridging experimental findings and human pathophysiology.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- UltrasensitiveAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Preclinical MRI Using HyperpolarizedMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Improving hyperpolarizedNMR in biomedicine · 2022Article
- In vivo methods and applications of xenon-129 magnetic resonance.Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of hyperpolarized
methodsSixteen male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly divided into two groups, the emphysema model group and control group. Experimental emphysematous models were made by instilling elastase into rat lungs of model group, the control group were instilled with isodose saline. Hyperpolarized
resultsThe pulmonary emphysematous model was successfully confirmed by the histology and all scans were also successful. The ADC value of
conclusionsThese results indicate that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.