Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28932406›Full record

ArticleCanine genetics and epidemiology2017

Large-scale survey to estimate the prevalence of disorders for 192 Kennel Club registered breeds.

B M Wiles, A M Llewellyn-Zaidi, K M Evans, D G O'Neill, T W Lewis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canine genetics and epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cutaneous and subcutaneous fibrolipomas in 236 dogs, 2017-2024: a retrospective case series and comparative review.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Monocytes Count, NLR, MLR and PLR in Canine Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  7. Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

B M WilesThe Kennel Club, Clarges Street, London, W1J 8AB England, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5123-7989
A M Llewellyn-ZaidiInternational Partnership for Dogs, 504547 Grey Rd 1, Georgia Bluffs, ON England, UK.
K M EvansThe Kennel Club, Clarges Street, London, W1J 8AB England, UK.
D G O'NeillVeterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health, Royal Veterinary College, London, NW1 0TU UK.
T W LewisThe Kennel Club, Clarges Street, London, W1J 8AB England, UK.
University of Nottingham · GBKennel Club Charitable Trust · GBKES International · GBRoyal Veterinary College · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPedigree or purebred dogs are often stated to have high prevalence of disorders which are commonly assumed to be a consequence of inbreeding and selection for exaggerated features. However, few studies empirically report and rank the prevalence of disorders across breeds although such data are of critical importance in the prioritisation of multiple health concerns, and to provide a baseline against which to explore changes over time. This paper reports an owner survey that gathered disorder information on Kennel Club registered pedigree dogs, regardless of whether these disorders received veterinary care. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of disorders among pedigree dogs overall and, where possible, determine any variation among breeds.

resultsThis study included morbidity data on 43,005 live dogs registered with the Kennel Club. Just under two thirds of live dogs had no reported diseases/conditions. The most prevalent diseases/conditions overall were lipoma (4.3%; 95% confidence interval 4.13-4.52%), skin (cutaneous) cyst (3.1%; 2.94-3.27%) and hypersensitivity (allergic) skin disorder (2.7%; 2.52-2.82%). For the most common disorders in the most represented breeds, 90 significant differences between the within breed prevalence and the overall prevalence are reported.

conclusionThe results from this study have added vital epidemiological data on disorders in UK dogs. It is anticipated that these results will contribute to the forthcoming Breed Health & Conservation Plans, a Kennel Club initiative aiming to assist in the identification and prioritisation of breeding selection objectives for health and provide advice to breeders/owners regarding steps that may be taken to minimise the risk of the disease/disorders. Future breed-specific studies are recommended to report more precise prevalence estimates within more breeds.

Indexed as

BreedsDogsMorbidityPedigreePrevalenceSurvey

Identifiers

PMID28932406
PMCPMC5604186
OpenAlexW2735379956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.