Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28932345›Full record

ArticleThe World Allergy Organization journal2017

The grass pollen season 2015: a proof of concept multi-approach study in three different European cities.

Maximilian Kmenta, Katharina Bastl, Uwe Berger, Matthias F Kramer, Matthew D Heath, Sanna Pätsi, Anna-Mari Pessi, Annika Saarto, Barbora Werchan, Matthias Werchan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Maximilian KmentaDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2182-0409
Katharina BastlDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Uwe BergerDepartment of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Matthias F KramerBencard Allergie GmbH, Leopoldstraße 175, 80804 Munich, Germany.
Matthew D HeathAllergy Therapeutics Ltd, Dominion Way, Worthing, UK.
Sanna PätsiAerobiology Unit, University of Turku, 20014 Turun yliopisto, Turku, Finland.
Anna-Mari PessiAerobiology Unit, University of Turku, 20014 Turun yliopisto, Turku, Finland.
Annika SaartoAerobiology Unit, University of Turku, 20014 Turun yliopisto, Turku, Finland.
Barbora WerchanFoundation German Pollen Information Service, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Matthias WerchanFoundation German Pollen Information Service, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Reinhard ZetterDepartment of Paleontology, University of Vienna, Geozentrum UZA II, Althanstraße 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Karl-Christian BergmannFoundation German Pollen Information Service, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Turku · FIAllergy Therapeutics (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrasses release the most widespread aeroallergens with considerable sensitization rates, while different species produce several pollen concentration peaks throughout the season. This study analyzed the prevalence of grass species in three different European city areas and compared the flowering period of these species with daily pollen concentrations and the symptom loads of grass pollen allergy sufferers.

methodsThe most prevalent grass species in Vienna (Austria), Berlin (Germany) and Turku (Finland) were studied and examined by use of three different approaches: phenology, pollen monitoring and symptom load evaluation. A mobile pollen exposure chamber was employed to observe reaction patterns of grass pollen allergy sufferers to three common grass species evaluated in this study versus placebo.

resultsCommon meadow grass (

conclusionThe phenological observations, pollen measurements and symptom data evaluation provided unique insights into the contribution of multiple grass species in different European regions. All investigated grass species in the provocation induced rhinitis symptoms of comparable significance, with some degree of variation in symptom patterns.

Indexed as

Grass pollen allergyPatient’s Hayfever DiaryPhenologyPollen exposure chamberSymptom data

Identifiers

PMID28932345
PMCPMC5594510
OpenAlexW2742759558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.