ArticleEuropean journal of dentistry
Predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography intensity values.
Article in European journal of dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Bone Conditions on the Accuracy of Implant Placement.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Role of CBCT in Prediction of Oro-antral Communication Post Third Molar Extraction: A Retrospective Study.European journal of dentistry · 2023Article
- New classification for bone type at dental implant sites: a dental computed tomography study.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Removal of a Horizontally Displaced Dental Implant below the Mandibular Canal.Case reports in dentistry · 2023Article
- Image Segmentation Technology Based on Attention Mechanism and ENet.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Three-dimensional descriptive study of the pterygomaxillary region related to pterygoid implants: A retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2019Observational
- Jawbone quality classification in dental implant planning and placement studies. A scoping review.Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community DentistryArticle
- Reliability of Grayscale Value for Bone Density Determination in Oral Rehabilitation using Dental Implants.International journal of applied & basic medical researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the predictability of bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) intensity values. MATERIALS AND
methodsCBCT cross-sectional images for 436 posterior mandibular implant sites were selected for the study. Using Invivo software (Anatomage, San Jose, California, USA), two observers classified the bone density into three categories: low, intermediate, and high, and CBCT intensity values were generated.
resultsBased on the consensus of the two observers, 15.6% of sites were of low bone density, 47.9% were of intermediate density, and 36.5% were of high density. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that CBCT intensity values had a high predictive power for predicting high density sites (area under the curve [AUC] =0.94,
conclusionsCBCT intensity values are considered useful for predicting bone density at posterior mandibular implant sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.