Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28931946›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Comparison of perfusion models for quantitative T1 weighted DCE-MRI of rectal cancer.

Tanja Gaa, Wiebke Neumann, Sonja Sudarski, Ulrike I Attenberger, Stefan O Schönberg, Lothar R Schad, Frank G Zöllner

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Variability and Reproducibility of 3Scientific reports · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tanja GaaComputer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. tanja.gaa@medma.uni-heidelberg.de.
Wiebke NeumannComputer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Sonja SudarskiInstitute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Ulrike I AttenbergerInstitute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan O SchönbergInstitute of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Lothar R SchadComputer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Frank G ZöllnerComputer Assisted Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3405-1394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, the two compartment exchange model and two compartment uptake model were applied to obtain quantitative perfusion parameters in rectum carcinoma and the results were compared to those obtained by the deconvolution algorithm. Eighteen patients with newly diagnosed rectal carcinoma underwent 3 T MRI of the pelvis including a T

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, TheoreticalAgedContrast MediaFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPerfusionProspective StudiesRectal NeoplasmsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID28931946
PMCPMC5607266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.