ArticleScientific reports2017
Ultrasensitive Nano-rt-iPCR for Determination of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers in Natural Samples.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extensive polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) use has resulted in its increasingly widespread presence in the environment. PBDEs release from existing products can still persist and accumulate in the environment as well as in human and wildlife magnifying through the food web. Due to its ultra-trace amount in the environment, a novel ultrasensitive nano-rt-iPCR assay has been developed to determine polybrominated diphenyl ethers in natural samples. Numerous amino-DNA and polyclonal antibody (anti-PBDE) were immobilized onto the single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) to form antibody-SWCNTs-DNA signal amplifier used in the proposed immunoassay system. Compared with rt-iPCR, this nano-rt-iPCR assay had a higher ratio of signal DNA, which meant higher signal measured and lower detection limit. This proposed nano-rt-iPCR assay was used to determine PBDEs in water samples ranging from 0.5 pg/L to 0.5ng/L; giving the LOD 1 pg/L. To the best of our knowledge, this nano-rt-iPCR is the most sensitive method for PBDEs detection. Because of that, this method needs no pre-concentration or extractions, using sample sizes as low as 10 µL. In general, this nano-rt-iPCR method will be a useful and potential way for batch detection of ultra-trace PBDEs in the aquatic environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.