Trial reportNeurology2017
Randomized open-label trial of dextromethorphan in Rett syndrome.
Trial report in Neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global prevalence of Rett syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Parent-reported outcome measures evaluating communication in individuals with rare neurodevelopmental disorders: A systematic review.International journal of language & communication disordersPooled it
- Article
- Multidimensional Analysis of a Social Behavior Identifies Regression and Phenotypic Heterogeneity in a Female Mouse Model for Rett Syndrome.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Profile of Trofinetide in the Treatment of Rett Syndrome: Design, Development and Potential Place in Therapy.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Review
- Electroencephalographic (EEG) Biomarkers in Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Journal of child neurology · 2023Review
- Targeting Sigma Receptors for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.CNS drugs · 2023Review
- Sigma-1 receptor and seizures.Pharmacological research · 2023Review
- Targeting NMDA Receptor Complex in Management of Epilepsy.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Selective Xi reactivation and alternative methods to restore MECP2 function in Rett syndrome.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2022Review
- MECP2-related pathways are dysregulated in a cortical organoid model of myotonic dystrophy.Science translational medicine · 2022Article
- Improving clinical trial readiness to accelerate development of new therapeutics for Rett syndrome.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2022Review
- Breathing disturbances in Rett syndrome.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2022Review
- Reviewing Evidence for the Relationship of EEG Abnormalities and RTT Phenotype Paralleled by Insights from Animal Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- N-Substituted-3-alkoxy-derivatives of dextromethorphan are functional NMDA receptor antagonists in vivo: Evidence from an NMDA-induced seizure model in rats.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2021Article
- The Pathophysiology of Rett Syndrome With a Focus on Breathing Dysfunctions.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Review
- Diurnal variation in autonomic regulation among patients with genotyped Rett syndrome.Journal of medical genetics · 2020Article
- The antitussive cloperastine improves breathing abnormalities in a Rett Syndrome mouse model by blocking presynaptic GIRK channels and enhancing GABA release.Neuropharmacology · 2020Article
- Drug Studies on Rett Syndrome: From Bench to Bedside.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2020Review
- Rett Syndrome and CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder: From Bench to Clinic.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine safety and perform a preliminary assessment of dose-dependent efficacy of dextromethorphan in normalizing electrographic spikes, clinical seizures, and behavioral and cognitive functions in girls with Rett syndrome.
methodsWe used a prospective randomized, open-label trial in fast metabolizers of dextromethorphan to examine the effect of dextromethorphan on core clinical features of Rett syndrome. Interictal spike activity and clinical seizures were determined using EEG and parent reporting. Cognitive data were obtained using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, while behavioral data were obtained from parent-completed checklists, the Aberrant Behavior Checklist-Community Version, and the Screen for Social Interaction. Anthropometric data were obtained according to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The Rett Syndrome Severity Scale provided a clinical global impression of the effect of dextromethorphan on clinical severity.
resultsDextromethorphan is safe for use in 3- to 15-year-old girls with Rett syndrome. Thirty-five girls were treated with 1 of 3 doses of dextromethorphan over a period of 6 months. Statistically significant dose-dependent improvements were seen in clinical seizures, receptive language, and behavioral hyperactivity. There was no significant improvement in global clinical severity as measured by the Rett Syndrome Severity Scale.
conclusionsDextromethorphan is a potent noncompetitive antagonist of the NMDA receptor channel that is safe for use in young girls with Rett syndrome. Preliminary evidence suggests that dextromethorphan may improve some core features of Rett syndrome. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that dextromethorphan at various doses does not change EEG spike counts over 6 months, though precision was limited to exclude an important effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.