ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017
Computerized Adaptive Testing Provides Reliable and Efficient Depression Measurement Using the CES-D Scale.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing (CD-CAT) for Adolescent Internet Gaming Disorder: A Conceptual Assessment Framework.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Validating an adaptive digital assessment of youth mental health needs: a cross-sectional study.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Development and Initial Validation of a Brief, Online Version of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D): Psychometric Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Review of Successful Workplace Interventions to Mitigate Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders in Poultry Processing Plant Workers: Current Knowledge and Future Prospects.Safety and health at work · 2025Review
- Applying multidimensional computerized adaptive testing to the MSQOL-54: a simulation study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2023Article
- Graded Response Model Analysis and Computer Adaptive Test Simulation of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 21: Evaluation and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Efficient and precise Ultra-QuickDASH scale measuring lymphedema impact developed using computerized adaptive testing.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Developing a Web-Based App to Assess Mental Health Difficulties in Secondary School Pupils: Qualitative User-Centered Design Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Article
- Maximizing the Potential of Patient-Reported Assessments by Using the Open-Source Concerto Platform With Computerized Adaptive Testing and Machine Learning.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Well-Being Scale for People in the University Environment (Pitt Wellness Scale) Using a Crowdsourcing Approach: Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Deriving an overall appearance domain score by applying bifactor IRT analysis to the BODY-Q appearance scales.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Developing a Computerized Adaptive Test to Assess Stress in Chinese College Students.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Response Time as an Implicit Self-Schema Indicator for Depression Among Undergraduate Students: Preliminary Findings From a Mobile App-Based Depression Assessment.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2019Article
- Article
- Validation of the Computerized Adaptive Test for Mental Health in Primary Care.Annals of family medicine · 2019Article
- Realizing the full potential of precision health: The need to include patient-reported health behavior, mental health, social determinants, and patient preferences data.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a measure of depressive symptomatology which is widely used internationally. Though previous attempts were made to shorten the CES-D scale, few have attempted to develop a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) version for the CES-D.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to provide evidence on the efficiency and accuracy of the CES-D when administered using CAT using an American sample group.
methodsWe obtained a sample of 2060 responses to the CESD-D from US participants using the myPersonality application. The average age of participants was 26 years (range 19-77). We randomly split the sample into two groups to evaluate and validate the psychometric models. We used evaluation group data (n=1018) to assess dimensionality with both confirmatory factor and Mokken analysis. We conducted further psychometric assessments using item response theory (IRT), including assessments of item and scale fit to Samejima's graded response model (GRM), local dependency and differential item functioning. We subsequently conducted two CAT simulations to evaluate the CES-D CAT using the validation group (n=1042).
resultsInitial CFA results indicated a poor fit to the model and Mokken analysis revealed 3 items which did not conform to the same dimension as the rest of the items. We removed the 3 items and fit the remaining 17 items to GRM. We found no evidence of differential item functioning (DIF) between age and gender groups. Estimates of the level of CES-D trait score provided by the simulated CAT algorithm and the original CES-D trait score derived from original scale were correlated highly. The second CAT simulation conducted using real participant data demonstrated higher precision at the higher levels of depression spectrum.
conclusionsDepression assessments using the CES-D CAT can be more accurate and efficient than those made using the fixed-length assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.