Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28931496›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2017

Computerized Adaptive Testing Provides Reliable and Efficient Depression Measurement Using the CES-D Scale.

Bao Sheng Loe, David Stillwell, Chris Gibbons

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Efficient and precise Ultra-QuickDASH scale measuring lymphedema impact developed using computerized adaptive testing.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Deriving an overall appearance domain score by applying bifactor IRT analysis to the BODY-Q appearance scales.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bao Sheng Loe *School of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6310-1608
David Stillwell *The Psychometrics Centre, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0174-3212
Chris Gibbons *The Psychometrics Centre, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4732-7305
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2014-07-028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) is a measure of depressive symptomatology which is widely used internationally. Though previous attempts were made to shorten the CES-D scale, few have attempted to develop a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT) version for the CES-D.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to provide evidence on the efficiency and accuracy of the CES-D when administered using CAT using an American sample group.

methodsWe obtained a sample of 2060 responses to the CESD-D from US participants using the myPersonality application. The average age of participants was 26 years (range 19-77). We randomly split the sample into two groups to evaluate and validate the psychometric models. We used evaluation group data (n=1018) to assess dimensionality with both confirmatory factor and Mokken analysis. We conducted further psychometric assessments using item response theory (IRT), including assessments of item and scale fit to Samejima's graded response model (GRM), local dependency and differential item functioning. We subsequently conducted two CAT simulations to evaluate the CES-D CAT using the validation group (n=1042).

resultsInitial CFA results indicated a poor fit to the model and Mokken analysis revealed 3 items which did not conform to the same dimension as the rest of the items. We removed the 3 items and fit the remaining 17 items to GRM. We found no evidence of differential item functioning (DIF) between age and gender groups. Estimates of the level of CES-D trait score provided by the simulated CAT algorithm and the original CES-D trait score derived from original scale were correlated highly. The second CAT simulation conducted using real participant data demonstrated higher precision at the higher levels of depression spectrum.

conclusionsDepression assessments using the CES-D CAT can be more accurate and efficient than those made using the fixed-length assessment.

Indexed as

Patient Outcome AssessmentPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdultComputersDepressionFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsassessmentdepressionpatient outcome assessmentpatient reported outcome measurespsychometrics

Identifiers

PMID28931496
PMCPMC5628285
OpenAlexW2753990554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.