Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28931441›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2017

Tracking progressive pathological and functional decline in the rTg4510 mouse model of tauopathy.

Thomas Blackmore, Soraya Meftah, Tracey Karen Murray, Peter James Craig, Anthony Blockeel, Keith Phillips, Brian Eastwood, Michael J O'Neill, Hugh Marston, Zeshan Ahmed and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Altered ribosomal function and protein synthesis caused by tau.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas BlackmoreLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd., Windlesham, UK. thomas.blackmore@hertford.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6503-2172
Soraya MeftahLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd., Windlesham, UK.
Tracey Karen MurrayLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd., Windlesham, UK.
Peter James CraigLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd., Windlesham, UK.
Anthony BlockeelLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd., Windlesham, UK.
Keith PhillipsLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd., Windlesham, UK.
Brian EastwoodLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd., Windlesham, UK.
Michael J O'NeillLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd., Windlesham, UK.
Hugh MarstonLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd., Windlesham, UK.
Zeshan AhmedLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd., Windlesham, UK.
Gary GilmourLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd., Windlesham, UK.
Francois GastambideLilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd., Windlesham, UK.
Eli Lilly (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe choice and appropriate use of animal models in drug discovery for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is pivotal to successful clinical translation of novel therapeutics, yet true alignment of research is challenging. Current models do not fully recapitulate the human disease, and even exhibit various degrees of regional pathological burden and diverse functional alterations. Given this, relevant pathological and functional endpoints must be determined on a model-by-model basis. The present work explores the rTg4510 mouse model of tauopathy as a case study to define best practices for the selection and validation of cognitive and functional endpoints for the purposes of pre-clinical AD drug discovery.

methodsMale rTg4510 mice were first tested at an advanced age, 12 months, in multiple behavioural assays (step 1). Severe tau pathology and neurodegeneration was associated with profound locomotor hyperactivity and spatial memory deficits. Four of these assays were then selected for longitudinal assessment, from 4 to 12 months, to investigate whether behavioural performance changes as a function of accumulation of tau pathology (step 2). Experimental suppression of tau pathology-via doxycycline administration-was also investigated for its effect on functional performance.

resultsProgressive behavioural changes were detected where locomotor activity and rewarded alternation were found to most closely correlate with tau burden and neurodegeneration. Doxycycline initiated at 4 months led to a 50% suppression of transgene expression, which was sufficient to prevent subsequent increases in tau pathology and arrest related functional decline.

conclusionsThis two-step approach demonstrates the importance of selecting assays most sensitive to the phenotype of the model. A robust relationship was observed between pathological progression, development of phenotype, and their experimental manipulation-three crucial factors for assessing the translational relevance of future pre-clinical findings.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionAge FactorsAnimalsBrainCognition DisordersCohort StudiesDiscrimination, PsychologicalDisease Models, AnimalDoxycyclineMaleMemory, Short-TermMental DisordersMiceMice, TransgenicMotor ActivityMutationDoxycyclinetau ProteinsAlzheimer’s DiseaseBehaviourCognitionNeurodegenerationPathologyrTg4510Tau

Identifiers

PMID28931441
PMCPMC5607580
OpenAlexW2755784837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.