Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28931383›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2017

Evaluation of caregiver-friendly workplace policy (CFWPs) interventions on the health of full-time caregiver employees (CEs): implementation and cost-benefit analysis.

Allison M Williams, Emile Tompa, Donna S Lero, Janet Fast, Amin Yazdani, Isik U Zeytinoglu

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Towards a socially informed fracture-prevention agenda: expanding the lens beyond epidemiology.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mental and Physical Wellbeing of Carer-Employees in Canada.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Male/Female Differences in the Impact of Caring for Elderly Relatives on Labor Market Attachment and Hours of Work: 1997-2015.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Allison M WilliamsSchool of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, General Science Building, 209, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. awill@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4701-500X
Emile TompaInstitute for Work and Health, University of Toronto, 481 University Avenue, Suite 800, Toronto, ON, M5G 2E9, Canada.
Donna S LeroDepartment of Family Relations and Applied Nutrition, Macdonald Institute, University of Guelph, 227A, 50 Macdonald Street, Guelph, ON, N1G 1Y1, Canada.
Janet FastDepartment of Human Ecology, University of Alberta, 2-06 Agriculture Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P5, Canada.
Amin YazdaniSchool of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, General Science Building, 209, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Isik U ZeytinogluDepartment of Human Resources and Management DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, 405, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4M4, Canada.
McMaster University · CAConestoga College · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Guelph · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

CIHR CG1–126585CIHR MOP-137044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent Canadian evidence illustrating the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of caregiver-friendly workplace policies is needed if Canadian employers are to adopt and integrate caregiver-friendly workplace policies into their employment practices. The goal of this three-year, three study research project is to provide such evidence for the auto manufacturing and educational services sectors. The research questions being addressed are: What are the impacts for employers (economic) and workers (health) of caregiver-friendly workplace policy intervention(s) for full-time caregiver-employees? What are the impacts for employers, workers and society of the caregiver-friendly workplace policy intervention(s) in each participating workplace? What contextual factors impact the successful implementation of caregiver-friendly workplace policy intervention(s)?

methodsUsing a pre-post-test comparative case study design, Study A will determine the effectiveness of newly implemented caregiver-friendly workplace policy intervention(s) across two workplaces to determine impacts on caregiver-employee health. A quasi-experimental pre-post design will allow the caregiver-friendly workplace policy intervention(s) to be tested with respect to potential impacts on health, and specifically on caregiver employee mental, psychosocial, and physical health. Framed within a comparative case study design, Study B will utilize cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis approaches to evaluate the economic impacts of the caregiver-friendly workplace policy intervention(s) for each of the two participating workplaces. Framed within a comparative case study design, Study C will undertake an implementation analysis of the caregiver-friendly workplace policy intervention(s) in each participating workplace in order to determine: the degree of support for the intervention(s) (reflected in the workplace culture); how sex and gender are implicated; co-workers' responses to the chosen intervention(s), and; other nuances at play. It is hypothesized that the benefits of the caregiver-friendly workplace policy intervention(s) will include improvements in caregiver-employees' mental, psychosocial and physical health, as well as evidence of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness for the employer. DISCUSSION: The expected project results will provide the research evidence for extensive knowledge translation work, to be carried out in collaboration with our knowledge transition partners, to the employer/human resources and occupational health/safety target populations.

trial registrationISRCTN16187974 Registered August 25, 2016.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthOrganizational PolicyAdultAgedCanadaCaregiversCost-Benefit AnalysisEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWorkplaceHealth.Intervention researchKnowledge translation.Mixed methods.Workplace accommodations.

Identifiers

PMID28931383
PMCPMC5607563
OpenAlexW2754857983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.