ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017
Improving contig binning of metagenomic data using [Formula: see text] oligonucleotide frequency dissimilarity.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- DecBin: Bayesian-optimized deep clustering for long-read metagenomic binning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Solving genomic puzzles: computational methods for metagenomic binning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
- Exploring microbial functional biodiversity at the protein family level-From metagenomic sequence reads to annotated protein clusters.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2023Review
- Music of metagenomics-a review of its applications, analysis pipeline, and associated tools.Functional & integrative genomics · 2022Review
- Improving metagenomic binning results with overlapped bins using assembly graphs.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2021Article
- Application of computational approaches to analyze metagenomic data.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2021Review
- Computational Modeling of the Human Microbiome.Microorganisms · 2020Review
- Classifying the Lifestyle of Metagenomically-Derived Phages Sequences Using Alignment-Free Methods.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- SolidBin: improving metagenome binning with semi-supervised normalized cut.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Reads Binning Improves Alignment-Free Metagenome Comparison.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Article
- Alignment-Free Sequence Analysis and Applications.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2018Article
- IdentifyingFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMetagenomics sequencing provides deep insights into microbial communities. To investigate their taxonomic structure, binning assembled contigs into discrete clusters is critical. Many binning algorithms have been developed, but their performance is not always satisfactory, especially for complex microbial communities, calling for further development.
resultsAccording to previous studies, relative sequence compositions are similar across different regions of the same genome, but they differ between distinct genomes. Generally, current tools have used the normalized frequency of k-tuples directly, but this represents an absolute, not relative, sequence composition. Therefore, we attempted to model contigs using relative k-tuple composition, followed by measuring dissimilarity between contigs using [Formula: see text]. The [Formula: see text] was designed to measure the dissimilarity between two long sequences or Next-Generation Sequencing data with the Markov models of the background genomes. This method was effective in revealing group and gradient relationships between genomes, metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. With many binning tools available, we do not try to bin contigs from scratch. Instead, we developed [Formula: see text] to adjust contigs among bins based on the output of existing binning tools for a single metagenomic sample. The tool is taxonomy-free and depends only on k-tuples. To evaluate the performance of [Formula: see text], five widely used binning tools with different strategies of sequence composition or the hybrid of sequence composition and abundance were selected to bin six synthetic and real datasets, after which [Formula: see text] was applied to adjust the binning results. Our experiments showed that [Formula: see text] consistently achieves the best performance with tuple length k = 6 under the independent identically distributed (i.i.d.) background model. Using the metrics of recall, precision and ARI (Adjusted Rand Index), [Formula: see text] improves the binning performance in 28 out of 30 testing experiments (6 datasets with 5 binning tools). The [Formula: see text] is available at https://github.com/kunWangkun/d2SBin .
conclusionsExperiments showed that [Formula: see text] accurately measures the dissimilarity between contigs of metagenomic reads and that relative sequence composition is more reasonable to bin the contigs. The [Formula: see text] can be applied to any existing contig-binning tools for single metagenomic samples to obtain better binning results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.