Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28931373›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Improving contig binning of metagenomic data using [Formula: see text] oligonucleotide frequency dissimilarity.

Ying Wang, Kun Wang, Yang Young Lu, Fengzhu Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Application of computational approaches to analyze metagenomic data.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Alignment-Free Sequence Analysis and Applications.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2018
    Article
  13. IdentifyingFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ying WangDepartment of Automation, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005 China.ORCID 0000-0001-8766-5950
Kun WangDepartment of Automation, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005 China.
Yang Young LuMolecular and Computational Biology Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, CA 90089 USA.
Fengzhu SunMolecular and Computational Biology Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, CA 90089 USA.

Funding

Computational Studies of Virus-host Interactions Using Metagenomics Data and ApplicationsR01GM120624 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI AHLGREN, NATHAN, SUN, FENGZHU · 2017 to 2020
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetagenomics sequencing provides deep insights into microbial communities. To investigate their taxonomic structure, binning assembled contigs into discrete clusters is critical. Many binning algorithms have been developed, but their performance is not always satisfactory, especially for complex microbial communities, calling for further development.

resultsAccording to previous studies, relative sequence compositions are similar across different regions of the same genome, but they differ between distinct genomes. Generally, current tools have used the normalized frequency of k-tuples directly, but this represents an absolute, not relative, sequence composition. Therefore, we attempted to model contigs using relative k-tuple composition, followed by measuring dissimilarity between contigs using [Formula: see text]. The [Formula: see text] was designed to measure the dissimilarity between two long sequences or Next-Generation Sequencing data with the Markov models of the background genomes. This method was effective in revealing group and gradient relationships between genomes, metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. With many binning tools available, we do not try to bin contigs from scratch. Instead, we developed [Formula: see text] to adjust contigs among bins based on the output of existing binning tools for a single metagenomic sample. The tool is taxonomy-free and depends only on k-tuples. To evaluate the performance of [Formula: see text], five widely used binning tools with different strategies of sequence composition or the hybrid of sequence composition and abundance were selected to bin six synthetic and real datasets, after which [Formula: see text] was applied to adjust the binning results. Our experiments showed that [Formula: see text] consistently achieves the best performance with tuple length k = 6 under the independent identically distributed (i.i.d.) background model. Using the metrics of recall, precision and ARI (Adjusted Rand Index), [Formula: see text] improves the binning performance in 28 out of 30 testing experiments (6 datasets with 5 binning tools). The [Formula: see text] is available at https://github.com/kunWangkun/d2SBin .

conclusionsExperiments showed that [Formula: see text] accurately measures the dissimilarity between contigs of metagenomic reads and that relative sequence composition is more reasonable to bin the contigs. The [Formula: see text] can be applied to any existing contig-binning tools for single metagenomic samples to obtain better binning results.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene FrequencyGenomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingInternetMarkov ChainsMetagenomicsUser-Computer InterfaceContig binningdissimilarity, k-tupleMetagenomicsTaxonomy-independent

Identifiers

PMID28931373
PMCPMC5607646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.