Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28931057›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Challenges and advances for transcriptome assembly in non-model species.

Arnaud Ungaro, Nicolas Pech, Jean-François Martin, R J Scott McCairns, Jean-Philippe Mévy, Rémi Chappaz, André Gilles

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Insights into the species evolution ofEcology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Proteotranscriptomics - A facilitator in omics research.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Modern Approaches for Transcriptome Analyses in Plants.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  16. Data on theData in brief · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. CAARS: comparative assembly and annotation of RNA-Seq data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arnaud UngaroUMR 7263, Équipe Évolution Génome Environnement, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France.
Nicolas PechUMR 7263, Équipe Évolution Génome Environnement, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France.
Jean-François MartinUMR Centre de Biologie pour la Gestion des Populations, Montpellier SupAgro, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9176-4476
R J Scott McCairnsUMR 7263, Équipe Évolution Génome Environnement, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France.
Jean-Philippe MévyUMR 7263, Équipe Diversité Fonctionnement: des molécules aux écosystèmes, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France.
Rémi ChappazUMR 7263, Équipe Évolution Génome Environnement, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France.
André GillesUMR 7263, Équipe Évolution Génome Environnement, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Marseille, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Agro Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyses of high-throughput transcriptome sequences of non-model organisms are based on two main approaches: de novo assembly and genome-guided assembly using mapping to assign reads prior to assembly. Given the limits of mapping reads to a reference when it is highly divergent, as is frequently the case for non-model species, we evaluate whether using blastn would outperform mapping methods for read assignment in such situations (>15% divergence). We demonstrate its high performance by using simulated reads of lengths corresponding to those generated by the most common sequencing platforms, and over a realistic range of genetic divergence (0% to 30% divergence). Here we focus on gene identification and not on resolving the whole set of transcripts (i.e. the complete transcriptome). For simulated datasets, the transcriptome-guided assembly based on blastn recovers 94.8% of genes irrespective of read length at 0% divergence; however, assignment rate of reads is negatively correlated with both increasing divergence level and reducing read lengths. Nevertheless, we still observe 92.6% of recovered genes at 30% divergence irrespective of read length. This analysis also produces a categorization of genes relative to their assignment, and suggests guidelines for data processing prior to analyses of comparative transcriptomics and gene expression to minimize potential inferential bias associated with incorrect transcript assignment. We also compare the performances of de novo assembly alone vs in combination with a transcriptome-guided assembly based on blastn both via simulation and empirically, using data from a cyprinid fish species and from an oak species. For any simulated scenario, the transcriptome-guided assembly using blastn outperforms the de novo approach alone, including when the divergence level is beyond the reach of traditional mapping methods. Combining de novo assembly and a related reference transcriptome for read assignment also addresses the bias/error in contigs caused by the dependence on a related reference alone. Empirical data corroborate these findings when assembling transcriptomes from the two non-model organisms: Parachondrostoma toxostoma (fish) and Quercus pubescens (plant). For the fish species, out of the 31,944 genes known from D. rerio, the guided and de novo assemblies recover respectively 20,605 and 20,032 genes but the performance of the guided assembly approach is much higher for both the contiguity and completeness metrics. For the oak, out of the 29,971 genes known from Vitis vinifera, the transcriptome-guided and de novo assemblies display similar performance, but the new guided approach detects 16,326 genes where the de novo assembly only detects 9,385 genes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingTranscriptomeAnimalsComputational BiologyContig MappingFishesGenomeGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingModels, StatisticalMolecular Sequence AnnotationQuercusSequence Analysis, DNAZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID28931057
PMCPMC5607178
OpenAlexW2755196863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.