ArticlePloS one2017
Challenges and advances for transcriptome assembly in non-model species.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Awns Enhance the Thousand Seed Weight ofBiology · 2026Article
- Reference-free discovery with barcoded single-cell sequencing.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- De novo genome assembly of Ansell's mole-rat (Fukomys anselli).G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Poly(A) Profiling for Euglenozoans Using Oxford Nanopore Direct RNA Sequencing, Illustrated by the Example of Euglena gracilis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Molecular Characterization of Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Ovarian Axis Regulation in the Manchurian Zokor (Genes · 2025Article
- Transcriptome Analyses Revealed the Genetic Advantages in Polygynous Males ofEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- De novo transcriptome assembly and analysis during agarwood induction in Gyrinops versteegii Gilg. seedling.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing an efficient ensemble approach for high-quality de novo transcriptome assembly of Thymus daenensis.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Comparative Transcriptome Analyses of DifferentGenes · 2022Article
- Insights into the species evolution ofEcology and evolution · 2022Article
- Breaking the reproductive barrier of divergent species to explore the genomic landscape.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Proteotranscriptomics - A facilitator in omics research.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Best practices on the differential expression analysis of multi-species RNA-seq.Genome biology · 2021Review
- Large-Scale Multiplexing Permits Full-Length Transcriptome Annotation of 32 Bovine Tissues From a Single Nanopore Flow Cell.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Modern Approaches for Transcriptome Analyses in Plants.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Data on theData in brief · 2020Article
- Hybrid transcriptome sequencing approach improved assembly and gene annotation in Cynara cardunculus (L.).BMC genomics · 2020Article
- The seed water content as a time-independent physiological trait during germination in wild tree species such as Ceiba aesculifolia.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Using a transcriptome sequencing approach to explore candidate resistance genes against stemphylium blight in the wild lentil species Lens ervoides.BMC plant biology · 2019Article
- CAARS: comparative assembly and annotation of RNA-Seq data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analyses of high-throughput transcriptome sequences of non-model organisms are based on two main approaches: de novo assembly and genome-guided assembly using mapping to assign reads prior to assembly. Given the limits of mapping reads to a reference when it is highly divergent, as is frequently the case for non-model species, we evaluate whether using blastn would outperform mapping methods for read assignment in such situations (>15% divergence). We demonstrate its high performance by using simulated reads of lengths corresponding to those generated by the most common sequencing platforms, and over a realistic range of genetic divergence (0% to 30% divergence). Here we focus on gene identification and not on resolving the whole set of transcripts (i.e. the complete transcriptome). For simulated datasets, the transcriptome-guided assembly based on blastn recovers 94.8% of genes irrespective of read length at 0% divergence; however, assignment rate of reads is negatively correlated with both increasing divergence level and reducing read lengths. Nevertheless, we still observe 92.6% of recovered genes at 30% divergence irrespective of read length. This analysis also produces a categorization of genes relative to their assignment, and suggests guidelines for data processing prior to analyses of comparative transcriptomics and gene expression to minimize potential inferential bias associated with incorrect transcript assignment. We also compare the performances of de novo assembly alone vs in combination with a transcriptome-guided assembly based on blastn both via simulation and empirically, using data from a cyprinid fish species and from an oak species. For any simulated scenario, the transcriptome-guided assembly using blastn outperforms the de novo approach alone, including when the divergence level is beyond the reach of traditional mapping methods. Combining de novo assembly and a related reference transcriptome for read assignment also addresses the bias/error in contigs caused by the dependence on a related reference alone. Empirical data corroborate these findings when assembling transcriptomes from the two non-model organisms: Parachondrostoma toxostoma (fish) and Quercus pubescens (plant). For the fish species, out of the 31,944 genes known from D. rerio, the guided and de novo assemblies recover respectively 20,605 and 20,032 genes but the performance of the guided assembly approach is much higher for both the contiguity and completeness metrics. For the oak, out of the 29,971 genes known from Vitis vinifera, the transcriptome-guided and de novo assemblies display similar performance, but the new guided approach detects 16,326 genes where the de novo assembly only detects 9,385 genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.